The educational experiences of pupils with a Statement for special educational needs in mainstream primary schools: results from a systematic observation study

Findings from the Deployment and Impact of Support Staff project showed that day-to-day support for pupils with special education needs (SEN) in mainstream UK schools is often provided by teaching assistants (TAs), instead of teachers. This arrangement is the main explanation for other results from the project, which found TA support had a more profound, negative impact on the academic progress of pupils with SEN than pupils without SEN. There is, however, surprisingly little systematic information on the overall support and interactions experienced by pupils with the highest levels of SEN attending mainstream schools (e.g. those with Statements). The Making a Statement project was designed to provide such a picture in state-funded primary schools in England (e.g. schools attended by children aged between five and 11). Extensive systematic observations were conducted of 48 pupils with Statements and 151 average-attaining ‘control’ pupils. Data collected over 2011/12 involved researchers shadowing pupils in Year 5 (nine- and 10-year olds) over one week each. The results, reported here, show that the educational experiences of pupils with Statements is strongly characterised by a high degree of separation from the classroom, their teacher and peers. A clear point to emerge was the intimate connection between TAs and the locations, in and away from the classroom, in which pupils with Statements are taught. The currency of Statements – a set number of hours of TA support – is identified as key factor in why provision leads to these arrangements, and appears to get in the way of schools thinking through appropriate pedagogies for pupils with the most pronounced learning difficulties.

[1]  J. Swain,et al.  Parents reviewing Annual Reviews , 2003 .

[2]  P. Croll Systematic Classroom Observation , 1986 .

[3]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[4]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  C. Penfold Parental confidence in the special educational needs assessment, statementing and tribunal system : qualitative study , 2009 .

[6]  S. Strand,et al.  Longitudinal patterns of behaviour problems in children with specific speech and language difficulties: child and contextual factors. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  Dimitra Hartas Practices of parental participation: a case study , 2008 .

[8]  Pa Triggs,et al.  What Pupils Say: Changing Policy and Practice in Primary Education , 2001 .

[9]  L. Florian,et al.  From special education to effective schools for all : a review of progress so far , 2013 .

[10]  P. Mortimore,et al.  School Matters: The Junior Years , 1995 .

[11]  G. Richards Reassessing the impact of teaching assistants: how research challenges practice and policy , 2013 .

[12]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Double standards and first principles: framing teaching assistant support for pupils with special educational needs , 2010 .

[13]  M. F. Giangreco,et al.  Teacher assistants in inclusive schools , 2007 .

[14]  Julie Radford,et al.  Opening up and closing down: How teachers and TAs manage turn-taking, topic and repair in mathematics lessons , 2011 .

[15]  M. Galton,et al.  Inside the Primary Classroom: 20 Years On , 1999 .

[16]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Maximising the Impact of Teaching Assistants: Guidance for school leaders and teachers , 2015 .

[17]  P. Blatchford,et al.  The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention , 2009 .

[18]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Challenging and changing how schools use teaching assistants: findings from the Effective Deployment of Teaching Assistants project , 2013 .

[19]  M. F. Giangreco,et al.  “Be Careful What You Wish for …”: Five Reasons to be concerned about the Assignment of Individual Paraprofessionals , 2005 .

[20]  Robert M. Klassen,et al.  'After the Statement': Reading progress made by secondary students with specific literacy difficulty provision , 2001 .

[21]  P. Croll,et al.  One in Five: The Assessment and Incidence of Special Educational Needs , 1985 .

[22]  Sonia Jackson,et al.  One in Five: The assessment and incidence of special educational needs Paul Croll and Diana Moses, Foreword by Professor Gerald Bernbaum Routledge and Kegan Paul, 168 pp. £12.95 , 1986 .

[23]  Christine M. Rubie-Davies,et al.  Enhancing learning? A comparison of teacher and teaching assistant interactions with pupils , 2010 .

[24]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  A systematic observational study of teachers’ and pupils’ behaviour in large and small classes , 2003 .