Assessment of the Technological Development and Economic Potential of Photobioreactors

In this paper, we investigate the development and economic potential of the photobioreactor (PBR) technology for energy purposes, i.e. production of hydrogen or biofuels. The approach adopted is to consider the technology, its expected costs and revenues, and related risks from an investor perspective. To this end we develop an investment model that is used to calculate the economic feasibility of PBRs for different scenarios, including a best-case scenario, with plenty of sunlight and water, inexpensive nutrients, high prices for hydrogen and biomass, and low other costs. The best-case scenario is compared to a scenario with less favorable boundary conditions. We find that PBR efficiencies will likely be less than 10%, with typical values between 1.8% and 5.6%. We also find that hydrogen production costs would be lower than those for biodiesel or biogas from solid biomass produced in PBRs. Compared to biofuels from traditional agriculture there is a great advantage for the PBR technology if land is scarce, because land is used more efficiently. Since PBRs can be designed as a closed system they can be applied in very dry regions. In the long term this might enable this promising concept to penetrate the energy supply market.

[1]  W. Süss,et al.  Reserven, Ressourcen und Verfügbarkeit von - Energierohstoffen , 1989 .

[2]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Economic Assessment of a Concentrating Solar Power Forecasting System for Participation in the Spanish Electricity Market , 2011 .

[3]  Olaf Kruse,et al.  Improved Photobiological H2 Production in Engineered Green Algal Cells* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  The role of biomass in California's hydrogen economy , 2008 .

[5]  A. Melis,et al.  Maximizing Light Utilization Efficiency and Hydrogen Production in Microalgal Cultures , 2009 .

[6]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach , 2009 .

[7]  Telma Teixeira Franco,et al.  Biomass production and carbon dioxide fixation by Aphanothece microscopica Nägeli in a bubble column photobioreactor , 2008 .

[8]  S. Long,et al.  What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Responsiveness of Residential Electricity Demand in OECD Countries: A Panel Cointegation and Causality Analysis , 2011 .

[10]  M. Ising,et al.  Energie aus Biomasse , 2000 .

[11]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Technological learning in bioenergy systems , 2006 .

[12]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Sustained photobiological hydrogen gas production upon reversible inactivation of oxygen evolution in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[13]  O. Lucon,et al.  Ethanol learning curve—the Brazilian experience , 2004 .

[14]  R. Tol,et al.  Evaluating the costs of desalination and water transport , 2005 .

[15]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Technological Learning in the Energy Sector , 2008 .

[16]  C. Sequeira,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION , 2010 .

[17]  A. Melis,et al.  Hydrogen production. Green algae as a source of energy. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[18]  W. A. Amos,et al.  Updated Cost Analysis of Photobiological Hydrogen Production from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Green Algae: Milestone Completion Report , 2004 .