New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were evaluated in 36 female and 40 male subjects. In agreement with the results of previous surveys, emissions were found to be more prevalent in female subjects and there was a tendency for the male subjects to have fewer emissions in their left ears. The digitization of five minute samples of ear canal signals, combined with sophisticated data analysis, produced a substantial reduction in the emission detection threshold. 588 emissions were detected in 72% of the subjects and 56% of the ears. Of the observed emissions, 18 could be identified with cubic distortion products of other emissions, and 11 could be identified as harmonic products (i.e., integral frequency multiples of other emissions). The large number of emissions detected (one subject had 32 in her right ear and 25 in her left) permitted evaluation of the pattern of separation of emissions. The average effective separation along the basilar membrane (according to the Greenwood frequency map) for adjacent emissions of all ears was 0.427 mm with interquartile values of 0.387 mm and 0.473 mm. The relationship between emission power, frequency, and full width at half maximum appears to be in agreement with the implications of a noise perturbed Van der Pol oscillator model of spontaneous emissions.

[1]  M E Demorest,et al.  Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  W. Fritze,et al.  A long-term observation of spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions (SOAEs). , 1992, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  R Probst,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Ears: Normative Findings , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[4]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H. Wit,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the European edible frog (Rana esculenta): Spectral details and temperature dependence , 1989, Hearing Research.

[6]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in different racial groups. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Critical bandwidth and consonance in relation to cochlear frequency-position coordinates , 1991, Hearing Research.

[9]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Cochlear preprocessing in analog models, in digital models and in human inner ear , 1990, Hearing Research.

[10]  E. Zwicker On the frequency separation of simultaneously evoked otoacoustic emissions' consecutive extrema and its relation to cochlear traveling waves. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emission Generators Behave Like Coupled Oscillators , 1990 .

[12]  S. L. Campbell,et al.  Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H P Wit,et al.  Amplitude and frequency fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. Whitehead Slow variations of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions , 1991, Hearing Research.

[15]  Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. M. Burns,et al.  Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions , 1984, Hearing Research.