Wheelchair users and public transit: eliciting ascriptions of comfort and safety

Transport policies often contain explicit goals for the travel quality of disabled passenger groups. Addressing the user perspective, focus group discussions with wheelchair-seated passengers (using bus transit and Special Transportation Services) were therefore held, in order to qualitatively explore perceived comfort and safety - two important quality factors. The comfort and safety constructs were shown to refer to technical (vehicle technology and systems design) as well as social aspects (trust, predictability, communication), and the construct meanings were intertwined. The emerging dualism of the constructs is important to consider, particularly since the social aspects were stressed as being travel quality prerequisites. Methodologically, the focus group method proved useful, and the use of in-vivo impressions could serve as valuable input into quantitative research or evaluations.

[1]  Anders Wretstrand,et al.  Safety as perceived by wheelchair-seated passengers in special transportation services. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  J. Sim,et al.  Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  John Gaber,et al.  Using Focus and NomiNal Group Techniques for a Better Understanding of the Transit Disadvantaged Needs , 2002 .

[4]  G Shaw.  Wheelchair rider risk in motor vehicles: a technical note. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[6]  Gunilla Carlsson.  Catching the Bus in Old Age - Methodological Aspects of Accessibility Assessments in Public Transport , 2002 .

[7]  Anders Wretstrand,et al.  The safety of passengers in wheelchairs in special transportation services studied with interviews and assessments , 2004 .

[8]  U. Flick.  An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[9]  Barbara A. Crane,et al.  Development of a consumer-driven Wheelchair Seating Discomfort Assessment Tool (WcS-DAT) , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[10]  J. Barrett,et al.  Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Stig Knutsson.  Funktionshindrades värdering av färdtjänst , 1998 .

[12]  Gerald Prein,et al.  Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction , 1997 .

[13]  Kersti Samuelsson.  Active wheelchair use in daily life: considerations for mobility and seating , 2002 .

[14]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[15]  Anders Wretstrand.  Wheelchair Passengers and Local Public Transport Vehicles: Perceptions of Safety and Comfort , 2003 .

[16]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Rational actors or rational fools: implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics , 2002 .

[17]  Jane Seale,et al.  Older people as partners in assistive technology research: The use of focus groups in the design process , 2002 .

[18]  Mary R. Lind,et al.  Fail-Safe Methods for Paratransit Safety , 2005 .

[19]  J Petzäll,et al.  Injuries in Special Transportation Services for Elderly and Disabled—A Multi-Methodology Approach to Estimate Incidence and Societal Costs , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  R A Cooper,et al.  Engineering manual and electric powered wheelchairs. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[21]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[22]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Focusing on Disability and Access in the Built Environment , 1998 .