Aging in Binaural Hearing Begins in Mid-Life: Evidence from Cortical Auditory-Evoked Responses to Changes in Interaural Phase

Older adults often have difficulty understanding speech in a noisy environment or with multiple speakers. In such situations, binaural hearing improves the signal-to-noise ratio. How does this binaural advantage change with increasing age? Using magnetoencephalography, we recorded cortical activity evoked by changes in interaural phase differences of amplitude-modulated tones. These responses occurred for frequencies up to 1225 Hz in young subjects but only up to 940 Hz in middle-aged and 760 Hz in older adults. Behavioral thresholds also decreased with increasing age but were more variable, likely because some older adults make effective use of compensatory mechanisms. The reduced frequency range for binaural hearing became significant in middle age, before decline in hearing sensation and the morphology of cortical responses, which became apparent only in the older subjects. This study provides evidence from human physiological data for the early onset of biological aging in binaural hearing.

[1]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J L Cranford,et al.  Influences of age and hearing loss on the precedence effect in sound localization. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  C. Pantev,et al.  Auditory cortex responses to the transition from monophonic to pseudo-stereo sound. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[4]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[5]  H. Heffner,et al.  Sound localization and use of binaural cues by the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of signal duration, signal frequency and masker duration on binaural masking level differences , 1986, Hearing Research.

[8]  Bruce A Schneider,et al.  Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[9]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing: Implications for Speech Perception , 2001 .

[10]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Just Noticeable Differences in Dichotic Phase , 1956 .

[11]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[12]  M. Hildesheimer,et al.  Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations , 2002, Hearing Research.

[13]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[14]  J. W. Wagener,et al.  Auditory Lateralization: Age Differences in Sensitivity to Dichotic Time and Amplitude Cues , 1977 .

[15]  N. Fujiki,et al.  Enhanced activation of the auditory cortex in patients with inner-ear hearing impairment: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Yuxuan Zhang,et al.  A review of learning with normal and altered sound-localization cues in human adults , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[18]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Coincidence Detection in the Auditory System 50 Years after Jeffress , 1998, Neuron.

[21]  Elizabeth D. Hickman,et al.  Effect of age on binaural speech intelligibility in normal hearing adults , 2006, Speech Commun..

[22]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of low-frequency tones and narrow bands of noise. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Jerger,et al.  Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  M. Lutman,et al.  Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: An exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[25]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[27]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  Laurent Demany,et al.  Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B. Grothe,et al.  New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms , 1997, Hearing Research.

[33]  David McAlpine,et al.  Creating a sense of auditory space , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  T. Picton,et al.  Physiological detection of interaural phase differences. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.