Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics

Three experiments examined transfer between two isomorphic subdomains of algebra and physics. The two areas were arithmetic-progression problems in algebra and constant-acceleration problems in physics. High school and college students who had learned one of these subtopics were presented with word problems that used either content from the domain they had originally studied or content based on the unfamiliar but analogous domain. Students who had learned arithmetic progressions were very likely to spontaneously recognize that physics problems involving velocity and distance can be addressed using the same equations. Analysis of problemsolving protocols revealed that the recognition was immediate and that the solutions were a straightforward application of the algebraic method. Such recognition occurred even when the algebraic procedures were taught using example word problems all of which were drawn from a single content area (e.g., "money" problems). In contrast, students who had learned the physics topic almost never exhibited any detectable transfer to the isomorphic algebra problems. In the only case of transfer from physics to algebra, the process was analogical in nature. In addition, transfer from algebra to physics word problems was impaired if the physics transfer problems were embedded in a discussion of motion concepts. The results were interpreted in terms of content-free versus content-specific applicability conditions for mathematical procedures.

[1]  A. Whitehead The aims of education , 1929 .

[2]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning structural descriptions from examples , 1970 .

[3]  Paul W. Zitzewitz Physics: Principles and Problems , 1972 .

[4]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states , 1974 .

[5]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[6]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .

[8]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  An interference matching technique for inducing abstractions , 1978, CACM.

[9]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and education. , 1980 .

[11]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[12]  Algebra 2 and Trigonometry , 1980 .

[13]  F. Reif,et al.  Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research , 1980 .

[14]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Recall of Mathematical Problem Information: Solving Related Problems. , 1981 .

[15]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , 1981, Cognition.

[17]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates , 1981 .

[18]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[20]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[21]  J. Carbonell Learning by Analogy: Formulating and Generalizing Plans from Past Experience , 1983 .

[22]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  John R. Anderson The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[24]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .

[26]  B. Ross Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[28]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. , 1985 .

[29]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[30]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The Pragmatics of Analogical Transfer , 1985 .

[31]  D. Krantz,et al.  The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving. , 1986 .

[33]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[34]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Mary Jo Kane,et al.  Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure * , 1986 .

[36]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. , 1986 .

[37]  B. Ross This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[38]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  A structure-mapping model for word problems. , 1987 .

[40]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .