On the inefficiency of the merit order in forward electricity markets with uncertain supply

This paper provides insight on the economic inefficiency of the classical merit-order dispatch in electricity markets with uncertain supply. For this, we consider a power system whose operation is driven by a two-stage electricity market, with a forward and a real-time market. We analyze two different clearing mechanisms: a conventional one, whereby the forward and the balancing markets are independently cleared following a merit order, and a stochastic one, whereby both market stages are co-optimized with a view to minimizing the expected aggregate system operating cost. We first derive analytical formulae to determine the dispatch rule prompted by the co-optimized two-stage market for a stylized power system with flexible, inflexible and stochastic power generation and infinite transmission capacity. This exercise sheds light on the conditions for the stochastic market-clearing mechanism to break the merit order. We then introduce and characterize two enhanced variants of the conventional two-stage market that result in either price-consistent or cost-efficient merit-order dispatch solutions, respectively. The first of these variants corresponds to a conventional two-stage market that allows for virtual bidding, while the second requires that the stochastic power production be centrally dispatched. Finally, we discuss the practical implications of our analytical results and illustrate our conclusions through examples.

[1]  Jin Zhong,et al.  Pricing Electricity in Pools With Wind Producers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  H. Outhred,et al.  Forward contracts for the operation of an electricity industry under spot pricing , 1990 .

[3]  Victor M. Zavala,et al.  A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties , 2015, Oper. Res..

[4]  Frederic H. Murphy,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of priority dispatch in the European electricity market , 2014 .

[5]  A. Fabbri,et al.  Assessment of the cost associated with wind generation prediction errors in a liberalized electricity market , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems , 2010 .

[7]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[8]  F. Bouffard,et al.  Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[9]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Electricity market clearing with improved scheduling of stochastic production , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  G. Zakeri,et al.  The effects of stochastic market clearing on the cost of wind integration: a case of New Zealand electricity market , 2014 .

[11]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Equilibrium Pricing and Optimal Hedging in Electricity Forward Markets , 1999 .

[12]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets: Operational Problems , 2013 .

[13]  H. L. Cadre,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Unpredictable Generation on Market Coupling , 2015 .

[14]  H. Madsen,et al.  On the market impact of wind energy forecasts , 2010 .

[15]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[16]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Revisiting the merit-order effect of renewable energy sources , 2013, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[17]  Geoffrey Pritchard,et al.  A Single-Settlement, Energy-Only Electric Power Market for Unpredictable and Intermittent Participants , 2010, Oper. Res..

[18]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Electric Energy Systems : Analysis and Operation , 2008 .