Encoding-related Brain Activity Predicts Subsequent Trial-level Control of Proactive Interference in Working Memory

Abstract Proactive interference (PI) appears when familiar information interferes with newly acquired information and is a major cause of forgetting in working memory. It has been proposed that encoding of item–context associations might help mitigate familiarity-based PI. Here, we investigate whether encoding-related brain activation could predict subsequent level of PI at retrieval using trial-specific parametric modulation. Participants were scanned with event-related fMRI while performing a 2-back working memory task with embedded 3-back lures designed to induce PI. We found that the ability to control interference in working memory was modulated by level of activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus, left hippocampus, and bilateral caudate nucleus during encoding. These results provide insight to the processes underlying control of PI in working memory and suggest that encoding of temporal context details support subsequent interference control.

[1]  J. Persson,et al.  Automatic and effortful control of interference in working memory can be distinguished by unique behavioral and functional brain representations , 2022, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Wagner,et al.  Encoding contexts are incidentally reinstated during competitive retrieval and track the temporal dynamics of memory interference , 2022, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  K. Oberauer,et al.  The contribution of episodic long-term memory to working memory for bindings , 2021, Cognition.

[4]  K. Norman,et al.  Is Activity Silent Working Memory Simply Episodic Memory? , 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  P. Weiss,et al.  Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Interference Control in Working Memory Is Associated with Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Volume , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017). , 2019, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  P. Weerd,et al.  Hippocampal‐striatal functional connectivity supports processing of temporal expectations from associative memory , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  Andy C H Lee,et al.  Evidence for the incorporation of temporal duration information in human hippocampal long-term memory sequence representations , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  A contextual binding theory of episodic memory: systems consolidation reconsidered , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Davachi,et al.  Transcending time in the brain: How event memories are constructed from experience , 2019, Hippocampus.

[12]  P. Weiss,et al.  Preserved but Less Efficient Control of Response Interference After Unilateral Lesions of the Striatum , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  L. Bäckman,et al.  Age-Differences in the Temporal Properties of Proactive Interference in Working Memory , 2017, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Marc W Howard.  Temporal and spatial context in the mind and brain , 2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[15]  Marika C Inhoff,et al.  Brain activity related to working memory for temporal order and object information , 2017, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  B. Gallhofer,et al.  The significance of caudate volume for age-related associative memory decline , 2015, Brain Research.

[17]  Troy A. Smith,et al.  Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  Learning robust cortico-cortical associations with the basal ganglia: An integrative review , 2015, Cortex.

[19]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity , 2014, Neuron.

[20]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Hippocampal Activity Patterns Carry Information about Objects in Temporal Context , 2014, Neuron.

[21]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Context-dependent switching between proactive and reactive working memory control mechanisms in the right inferior frontal gyrus , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Matthew L Shapiro,et al.  Memory Time , 2011, Neuron.

[25]  Daphna Shohamy,et al.  Cooperation between the Hippocampus and the Striatum during Episodic Encoding , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Shannon Tubridy,et al.  Medial temporal lobe contributions to episodic sequence encoding. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Control of interference during working memory updating. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  C. Ranganath,et al.  Prefrontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Activity at Encoding Predicts Temporal Context Memory , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  The Medial Temporal Lobe and the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Jointly Support Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Mapping interference resolution across task domains: A shared control process in left inferior frontal gyrus , 2009, Brain Research.

[31]  David E. Warren,et al.  Hippocampal Amnesia Impairs All Manner of Relational Memory , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[32]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Jonides,et al.  Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Making Working Memory Work: A Computational Model of Learning in the Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia , 2006, Neural Computation.

[35]  K. Oberauer.  Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Paul E. Gilbert,et al.  The role of CA1 in the acquisition of an object-trace-odor paired associate task. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[39]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  N. Hunkin,et al.  Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order of different kinds in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[41]  John B. Mitchell,et al.  The medial frontal cortex and temporal memory: tests using spontaneous exploratory behaviour in the rat , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  Gabriel Leonard,et al.  Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. , 2009, Psychological review.

[44]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Learning and memory functions of the Basal Ganglia. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[47]  B. Milner,et al.  Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory. , 1985, Human neurobiology.