Dissociation between hand motion and population vectors from neural activity in motor cortex

Preferred Direction of a cell. The activity of cells from monkeys a and b (39% of total sample) were recorded for 8 targets that were not symmetrically-distributed in space The standard approach (trigonometric method) to define the directionality of a cell 1 could not be used with these cells so we used techniques to describe planar objects (plate method) to identify the directionality of these cells. For each block of trials, vectors were constructed for each movement oriented with movement direction and scaled by cell discharge in polar space. The tips of adjacent vectors were connected by a curved line with a distance coordinate that varied linearly in magnitude in polar space between the two vector tips. Each pair of adjacent vectors and adjoining curved line was then treated as a three-sided planar object and we computed its relative area and centroid. Similar measures were made for each pair of adjacent vectors creating a total of eight objects. The total area and its centroid was then found across all eight objects. The position of the centroid relative to the origin served as a measure of the cell=s directionality for each block of trials. In order to test the validity of this plate method, the activity of 38 neurons was recorded for movements to 16 targets symmetrically distributed in space (every 22.5E). The PD of each cell computed using the trigonometric method from neural activity recorded for movements to all 16 targets was used as a baseline measure of the cell=s directionality. Table S1 shows the absolute mean error in the PDs for the different methods (trigonometric and plate) and the different target groups (16, 8 symmetric and 8 non-symmetric targets). The absolute mean error in the PD of cells using the 8 non-symmetric was 10.2E and only 2 neurons showed errors greater than the bin-size used to group the PD of cells in Fig. 2 (22.5E). Therefore, directional tuning of 95% of the cells sampled was within one bin-width of its actual tuning. Such small differences cannot account for the non-uniform distribution of preferred directions displayed in Figure 2. Relationship between cell modulation and PD. Figure S1a illustrates a polar plot of the mean cell modulation relative to movement direction. Cell modulation was defined as the highest mean discharge rate prior to and during movement (reaction time plus movement time) measured for any movement direction minus the lowest mean discharge …

[1]  R. Snodgrass Evolution of the annelida onychophora and arthropoda , 1938 .

[2]  J. L. Cisne,et al.  Trilobites and the Origin of Arthropods , 1974, Science.

[3]  K. Bremer THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  A. Kluge A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) , 1989 .

[5]  W. Wheeler,et al.  ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY: A COMBINED APPROACH , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[6]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  A. Sidow,et al.  A molecular evolutionary framework for eukaryotic model organisms , 1994, Current Biology.

[8]  Ward C. Wheeler,et al.  SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT, PARAMETER SENSITIVITY, AND THE PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF MOLECULAR DATA , 1995 .

[9]  Timothy M. Collins,et al.  Deducing the pattern of arthropod phytogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements , 1995, Nature.

[10]  D. Tautz,et al.  Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods , 1995, Nature.

[11]  S. Carranza,et al.  First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  W. Wheeler OPTIMIZATION ALIGNMENT: THE END OF MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT IN PHYLOGENETICS? , 1996 .

[13]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies , 1996 .

[14]  J. Shultz,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  S. Scott,et al.  Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  P. Štys,et al.  The basic body plan of arthropods: insights from evolutionary morphology and developmental biology , 1997 .

[17]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Likelihood-mapping: a simple method to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Raff,et al.  Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals , 1997, Nature.

[19]  N. Strausfeld Crustacean – Insect Relationships: The Use of Brain Characters to Derive Phylogeny amongst Segmented Invertebrates , 1998, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[20]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution , 1998 .

[21]  Arthropod Relationships , 1998, The Systematics Association Special Volume Series.

[22]  G. Scholtz,et al.  The pattern of Distal-less expression in the mouthparts of crustaceans, myriapods and insects: new evidence for a gnathobasic mandible and the common origin of Mandibulata. , 1998, The International journal of developmental biology.

[23]  D. Tautz,et al.  A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Richard S. Mann,et al.  Control of antennal versus leg development in Drosophila , 1998, Nature.

[25]  T. Kaufman,et al.  Molecular evidence for the gnathobasic derivation of arthropod mandibles and for the appendicular origin of the labrum and other structures , 1998, Development Genes and Evolution.

[26]  R. H. Thomas,et al.  Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Jeffrey L. Boore,et al.  Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans , 1998, Nature.

[28]  J. Shultz,et al.  Molecular Phylogeny of Arthropods and the Significance of the Cambrian “Explosion” for Molecular Systematics , 1998 .

[29]  T. Kocher,et al.  Mitogenomics: digging deeper with complete mitochondrial genomes. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  J. Mounolou,et al.  Mitochondrial Genes Collectively Suggest the Paraphyly of Crustacea with Respect to Insecta , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  Peter G. Foster,et al.  Compositional Bias May Affect Both DNA-Based and Protein-Based Phylogenetic Reconstructions , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[32]  J. Boore Animal mitochondrial genomes. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  P. Goloboff Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  A Review of Arthropod Phylogeny: New Data Based on Ribosomal DNA Sequences and Direct Character Optimization , 2000 .

[35]  J. Benzie,et al.  The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the crustacean Penaeus monodon: are malacostracan crustaceans more closely related to insects than to branchiopods? , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  B. Hausdorf Early evolution of the bilateria. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[37]  M. Akam Arthropods: developmental diversity within a (super) phylum. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Arthropod Cladistics: Combined Analysis of Histone H3 and U2 snRNA Sequences and Morphology , 2000 .

[39]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Pattern of Phylogenetic Relationships among Members of the Tribe Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences , 2000 .

[40]  Henry Gee Homegrown computer roots out phylogenetic networks , 2000, Nature.

[41]  Wei Qian,et al.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[42]  J. Shultz,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein–encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  M. Akam,et al.  Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods , 2001, Current Biology.

[44]  K. Peterson,et al.  Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences , 2001, Evolution & development.

[45]  T. Burmester,et al.  Diplopod hemocyanin sequence and the phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[46]  W. Dohle Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name 'Tetraconata' for the monophyletic unit Crustacea + Hexapoda , 2001 .

[47]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.