AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC

In this paper we review published research describing the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to support societal participation by adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. We focus on three major participation domains: post-secondary education and training, the workplace, and community living and social interaction opportunities. Based on the findings of the review, we highlight five needed areas of research and development related to AAC technology: face to face communication; distance communication and interconnectivity; training and support for system use; adapted applications and cognitive tools; and supports for independent operation, development, and maintenance.

[1]  Phyllis Levine,et al.  After High School: A First Look at the Postschool Experiences of Youth with Disabilities. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). , 2005 .

[2]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska , 1998 .

[3]  David McNaughton,et al.  “When I First Got It, I Wanted to Throw It Off a Cliff”: The Challenges and Benefits of Learning AAC Technologies as Described by Adults who use AAC , 2005 .

[4]  Janice C Light,et al.  Community-based employment: experiences of adults who use AAC , 1996 .

[5]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[6]  Janice Light,et al.  “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[7]  H. McConachie,et al.  Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[8]  Joanne P. Lasker,et al.  Helping a professor with aphasia resume teaching through multimodal approaches , 2005 .

[9]  Michael Williams,et al.  The AAC Mentor Project: Web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[10]  Janice C Light,et al.  “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[11]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: Opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[12]  Kathryn Drager,et al.  Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: The performance of typically developing 2-year-olds , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[13]  Cathy Binger,et al.  Building communicative competence with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication , 1998 .

[14]  Mary E Reynolds,et al.  A comparison of learning curves in natural and synthesized speech comprehension. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Opening Up a ‘Whole New World’: Employer and Co-Worker Perspectives on Working with Individuals who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2003 .

[16]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Cell Phone Use: One Off-the-Shelf Solution and Some Policy Considerations , 2004, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  Janice C Light,et al.  Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – communicative interaction , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[18]  Janice Light,et al.  The effects of internet-based instruction on the social problem solving of young adults who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[19]  D R Beukelman,et al.  Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Use of electronic technologies by people with intellectual disabilities. , 2009, Mental retardation.

[21]  Janice C Light,et al.  ‘Getting your wheel in the door’: successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2002 .

[22]  Mary Hunt-Berg.  The Bridge School: Educational Inclusion Outcomes over 15 Years , 2005 .

[23]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Ending the Silence: Adults who Use Augmentative Communication and their Experiences as Victims of Crimes , 2003 .

[24]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Augmentative communication and empowerment supports: A look at outcomes , 1995 .

[25]  Theo Fenton.  Communicating without Speech: Practical Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2002 .

[26]  David P. Wilkins,et al.  Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[27]  Donna McGhie-Richmond,et al.  Reducing the risk of sexual abuse for people who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[28]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Augmentative Communication Employment Training and Supports (ACETS): Some Employment-Related Outcomes , 2004 .

[29]  Janice Light,et al.  Teaching Automatic Linear Scanning for Computer Access: A Case Study of a Preschooler with Severe Physical and Communication Disabilities , 1993 .

[30]  John Todman,et al.  Rate and quality of conversations using a text-storage AAC system: Single-case training study , 2000 .

[31]  A. Odom,et al.  Moving toward Employment Using AAC: Case Study , 1997 .

[32]  J. Light,et al.  "My dream was to pay taxes": The self-employment experiences of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2006 .

[33]  Meg Grigal,et al.  Activities of Students with Significant Disabilities Receiving Services in Postsecondary Settings , 2004 .

[34]  Linda C. Mechling,et al.  Computer-Based Video Instruction to Teach the Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices for Ordering at Fast-Food Restaurants , 2006 .

[35]  D. NelsonBryen,et al.  Job-related social networks and communication technology. , 2006 .

[36]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  So you want to work? What employers say about job skills, recruitment and hiring employees who rely on AAC , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[37]  Martine Smith,et al.  The Dual Challenges of Aided Communication and Adolescence , 2005 .

[38]  Amy Staples,et al.  Developing Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) and Literacy Interventions in a Supported Employment Setting , 2003 .

[39]  P Mortola,et al.  Clinical trials and quality control: checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology. , 1991, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[40]  Sheryl Burghstahler,et al.  AAC, Employment, and Independent Living: A Success Story. , 2006 .

[41]  J. Light,et al.  Fifteen Years Later: An Investigation of the Long-Term Outcomes of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions. , 2001 .

[42]  Stephen Fickas,et al.  The longitudinal effects of accessible email for individuals with severe cognitive impairments , 2005 .

[43]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Enhancing AAC connections with the world , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[44]  E Moodie,et al.  AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[45]  Teresa Iacono,et al.  Crews,Wusses, and Whoppas: core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace , 1999 .

[46]  D. Deshler,et al.  Setting demand variables: a major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent , 1984 .