Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327:557–60. 28 Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Schachter R. Meta-Analysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of Evidence. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992. 29 Wolpert RL, Mengerson KL. Adjusted likelihoods for synthesizing empirical evidence from studies that differ in quality and design: effects of environmental tobacco smoke. Statist Sci 2004;19:450–71. 30 Greenland S. Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data (with Discussion). J Roy Statist Soc A 2005;168:267–306. 31 Spiegelhlater DJ, Best NG. Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost-effectiveness modelling. Statist Med 2003;22: 3687–709. 32 Greenland S, O’Rourke K. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics 2001;2:463–71. 33 Wilks DC, Mander AP, Jebb SA et al. Dietary energy density and adiposity: a bias-adjusted meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Public Health 2010. 34 Fox MP. Creating a demand for bias analysis in epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63:91. 35 Peterson RA, Brown SP. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 2005;90:175–181. 36 Prevost AT, Mason D, Griffin S, Kinmonth AL, Sutton S, Spiegelhalter D. Allowing for correlations between correlations in random-effects meta-analysis of correlation matrices. Psychol Methods 2007;12:434–50. 37 Carpenter WH, Poehlman ET, O’Connell M, Goran MI. Influence of body composition and resting metabolic rate on variation in total energy expenditure: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:4–10. 38 Song F, Parekh-Bhurke S, Hooper L et al. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:79. 39 National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Developing NICE Public Health Guidance. London: NICE, 2006. www.nice.org.uk/guidance. Accessed 1 November 2010.
[1]
John P A Ioannidis,et al.
Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
,
2008,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[2]
S Greenland,et al.
On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.
,
2001,
Biostatistics.
[3]
J. Ioannidis,et al.
Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings.
,
2009,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[4]
Sander Greenland,et al.
Multiple‐bias modelling for analysis of observational data
,
2005
.
[5]
Russell V. Lenth,et al.
MeWAnalysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of Evidence
,
1993
.
[6]
Kerrie Mengersen,et al.
Adjusted Likelihoods for Synthesizing Empirical Evidence from Studies that Differ in Quality and Design: Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke
,
2004
.
[7]
U. Ekelund,et al.
A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
,
2010,
International journal of epidemiology.
[8]
J. Ioannidis,et al.
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
,
2008,
PloS one.
[9]
M. Egger,et al.
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.
,
1999,
JAMA.
[10]
J. Ioannidis,et al.
Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.
,
2010,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[11]
E. Mohammadi,et al.
Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence
,
2017,
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.