Incremental treatment costs in national cancer institute-sponsored clinical trials.

CONTEXT Concern about additional costs for direct patient care impedes efforts to enroll patients in clinical trials. But generalizable evidence substantiating these concerns is lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the additional cost of treating cancer patients in the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored clinical trials in the United States across a range of trial phases, treatment modalities, and patient care settings. DESIGN Retrospective cost study using a multistage, stratified, random sample of patients enrolled in 1 of 35 active phase 3 trials or phase 1 or any phase 2 trials between October 1, 1998, and December 31, 1999. Unadjusted and adjusted costs were compared and related to trial phase, institution type, and vital status. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A representative sample of 932 cancer patients enrolled in nonpediatric, NCI-sponsored clinical trials and 696 nonparticipants with a similar stage of disease not enrolled in a research protocol from 83 cancer clinical research institutions across the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Direct treatment costs as measured using a combination of medical records, telephone survey, and Medicare claims data. Administrative and other research costs were excluded. RESULTS The incremental costs of direct care in trials were modest. Over approximately a 2.5-year period, adjusted costs were 6.5% higher for trial participants than nonparticipants (35,418 dollars vs 33,248 dollars; P =.11). Cost differences for phase 3 studies were 3.5% (P =.22), lower than for phase 1 or 2 trials (12.8%; P =.20). Trial participants who died had higher costs than nonparticipants who died (17.9%; 39,420 dollars vs 33,432 dollars, respectively; P =.15). CONCLUSIONS Treatment costs for nonpediatric clinical trial participants are on average 6.5% higher than what they would be if patients did not enroll. This implies total incremental treatment costs for NCI-sponsored trials of 16 million dollars in 1999. Incremental costs were higher for patients who died and who were in early phase studies although these findings deserve further scrutiny. Overall, the additional treatment costs of an open reimbursement policy for government-sponsored cancer clinical trials appear minimal.

[1]  Joy H. Lewis,et al.  Using Hospital Tumor Registries to Identify Research Subjects , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[2]  M. Paller,et al.  Clinical Trials at AHCs: The Perspective of an Academic Clinical Trials Office , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Estimating Health Care Costs Related to Cancer Treatment From SEER-Medicare Data , 2002, Medical care.

[4]  J. Pater,et al.  Factors affecting workload of cancer clinical trials: results of a multicenter study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Joseph B. Martin Academic-industrial collaboration: the good, the bad, and the ugly. , 2002, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association.

[6]  J. Krischer,et al.  Impact of Clinical Trials on the Cost of Cancer Care , 2001, Medical Care.

[7]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Lilford,et al.  Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect". , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  R. Figlin,et al.  Measuring the incremental cost of clinical cancer research. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Escarce,et al.  The Cost of Cancer Treatment Study's Design and Methods , 2000 .

[11]  N. Colabianchi,et al.  Referral of breast cancer patients to medical oncologists after initial surgical management. , 2000, Medical care.

[12]  N Colabianchi,et al.  Factors that predict the referral of breast cancer patients onto clinical trials by their surgeons and medical oncologists. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  L. Fehrenbacher,et al.  Cost of care for patients in cancer clinical trials. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  Incremental Costs of Enrolling Cancer Patients in Clinical Trials: a Population-Based Study. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  H. Aaron,et al.  Extending Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Trials , 2000 .

[16]  S. Edge,et al.  Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. , 1999, Current problems in cancer.

[17]  M. Brown Cancer patient care in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: what does it cost? , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  S. Cha,et al.  Incremental costs of enrolling cancer patients in clinical trials: a population-based study. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  P. LoRusso,et al.  Accrual to breast cancer clinical trials at a university-affiliated hospital in metropolitan Detroit. , 1999, American journal of clinical oncology.

[20]  W. Manning,et al.  The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. , 1998, Journal of health economics.

[21]  E. Perez,et al.  Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  E. Mansour,et al.  Barriers to clinical trials: Part III: Knowledge and attitudes of health care providers , 1994, Cancer.

[24]  W S Schain,et al.  Barriers to clinical trials: Part II: Knowledge and attitudes of potential participants , 1994 .

[25]  I. Fleming Barriers to clinical trials: Part I: Reimbursement problems , 1994, Cancer.

[26]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.

[27]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  B Fisher,et al.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition , 1963 .