Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.

OBJECTIVE In 1986, data from 25,000 major trauma outcome study patients were used to relate Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) values to survival probability. The resulting norms have been widely used. Motivated by TRISS limitations, A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) was introduced in 1990. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare TRISS and ASCOT probability predictions using carefully collected and independently reviewed data not used in the development of those norms. DESIGN This was a prospective data collection for consecutive admissions to four level I trauma centers participating in a major trauma outcome study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 14,296 patients admitted to the four study sites between October 1987 through 1989 were used. The indices were evaluated using measures of discrimination (disparity, sensitivity, specificity, misclassification rate, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve) and calibration [Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic (H-L)]. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS For blunt-injured adults, ASCOT has higher sensitivity than TRISS (69.3 vs. 64.3) and meets the criterion for model calibration (H-L statistic < 15.5) needed for accurate z and W scores. The TRISS does not meet the calibration criterion (H-L = 30.7). For adults with penetrating injury, ASCOT has a substantially lower H-L value than TRISS (20.3 vs. 138.4), but neither meets the criterion. Areas under TRISS and ASCOT ROC curves are not significantly different and exceed 0.91 for blunt-injured adults and 0.95 for adults with penetrating injury. For pediatric patients, TRISS and ASCOT sensitivities (near 77%) and areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (both exceed 0.96) are comparable, and both models satisfy the H-L criterion. CONCLUSIONS In this age of health care decisions influenced by outcome evaluations, ASCOT's more precise description of anatomic injury and its improved calibration with actual outcomes argue for its adoption as the standard method for outcome prediction.

[1]  E. Hannan,et al.  Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[3]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  W. Sacco,et al.  A comparison of the trauma score, the revised trauma score, and the pediatric trauma score. , 1989, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[5]  T. Clemmer,et al.  The economic impact of DRG payment policies on air-evacuated trauma patients. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  L. Fielding,et al.  Identification of preventable trauma deaths: confounded inquiries? , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  T A Gennarelli,et al.  A revision of the Trauma Score. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  H. Champion,et al.  The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  H. Champion,et al.  A comparison of Abbreviated Injury Scale 1980 and 1985 versions. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Ellen J. MacKenzie,et al.  The Effect of Preexisting Conditions on Mortality in Trauma Patients , 1990 .

[11]  Civetta Jm.  Scoring systems: do we need a different approach? , 1991 .

[12]  T Gennarelli,et al.  A new characterization of injury severity. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  C. Cayten,et al.  Comparison between TRISS and ASCOT methods in controlling for injury severity. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  Ramzy,et al.  INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF PREVENTABLE DEATH JUDGEMENTS FOR TRAUMA , 1991 .

[15]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Effect of preinjury illness on trauma patient survival outcome. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Results of a multi-institutional outcome assessment: results of a structured peer review of TRISS-designated unexpected outcomes. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Comparison of the ability of adult and pediatric trauma scores to predict pediatric outcome following major trauma. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  W J Sacco,et al.  Injury severity scoring again. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[20]  F. Rivara,et al.  Validity of applying adult TRISS analysis to injured children. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  F. Rivara,et al.  Revision of TRISS for intubated patients. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.