The Ophiostoma piceae complex in the Southern Hemisphere: a phylogenetic study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. A. Horgen,et al. A comparison of the nucleotide sequence of the cerato-ulmin gene and the rDNA ITS between aggressive and non-aggressive isolates ofOphiostoma ulmi sensu lato, the causal agent of Dutch elm disease , 2005, Current Genetics.
[2] C. Brasier,et al. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics , 1991, Mycopathologia.
[3] G. S. Hoog,et al. On the variability of Ophiostoma piceae , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.
[4] M. Wingfield,et al. Phylogeny of the Ophiostoma stenoceras–Sporothrix schenckii complex , 2003, Mycologia.
[5] R. Hamelin,et al. Genetic Variability of Canadian Populations of the Sapstain Fungus Ophiostoma piceae. , 2001, Phytopathology.
[6] M. Wingfield,et al. Ophiostoma africanum sp. nov., and a key to ophiostomatoid species from Protea infructescences , 2001 .
[7] C. Breuil,et al. Phylogenetic relationship of Ophiostoma piliferum to other sapstain fungi based on the nuclear rRNA gene. , 2001, FEMS microbiology letters.
[8] R. Farrell,et al. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Ophiostoma piceae complex and the Dutch elm disease fungi , 2001 .
[9] M. Hubbes. The American elm and Dutch elm disease , 1999 .
[10] C. Breuil,et al. Rapid Detection of Ophiostoma piceae andO. quercus in Stained Wood by PCR , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[11] M. Wingfield,et al. A new Ceratocystis species defined using morphological and ribosomal DNA sequence comparisons , 1996 .
[12] C. Brasier,et al. Genomic fingerprinting supports the separation of Ophiostoma piceae into two species , 1995 .
[13] E. Halmschlager,et al. Differentiation of Ophiostoma piceae and Ophiostoma quercus by Morphology and RAPD Analysis , 1995 .
[14] M. D. Mehrotra,et al. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas , 1995 .
[15] T. Harrington,et al. Use of (CAT)5 as a DNA fingerprinting probe for fungi , 1994 .
[16] C. Brasier,et al. Temperature-growth responses distinguish the OPC and OPH sibling species within ‘Ophiostoma piceae’ , 1993 .
[17] M. Wingfield,et al. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity , 1993 .
[18] C. Brasier,et al. Sibling species within Ophiostoma piceae , 1993 .
[19] T. Bruns,et al. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes ‐ application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts , 1993, Molecular ecology.
[20] M. Morelet,et al. Morphological differences between Ophiostoma piceae and O. querci, and among O. querci isolates , 1993 .
[21] C. Brasier. China and the origins of Dutch elm disease: an appraisal , 1990 .
[22] Thomas J. White,et al. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. , 1990 .
[23] T. White. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics , 1990 .
[24] L. J. Hutchison,et al. Taxonomy of some potential wood-staining fungi from New Zealand 1. Ophiostomataceae , 1988 .
[25] H. Butin,et al. Blue‐Stain Fungi on Nothofagus from Chile—Including Two New Species of Ceratocystis Ellis & Halst. , 1984 .
[26] H. Upadhyay. Monograph of Ceratocystis and Ceratocystiopsis , 1981 .
[27] J. Butcher. The causes of Sapstain in Red Beech , 1968 .
[28] Y. Nisikado,et al. Contributions to the Knowledge of the Sap Stains of Wood in Japan. III. Studies on Ceratostomella piceae Münch, the Cause of a Blue Stain of Pine Trees. , 1934 .