What Do Online Behavioral Advertising Disclosures Communicate to Users? (CMU-CyLab-12-008)

Online Behavioral Advertising (OBA) is the practice of tailoring ads based on an individual's online activities. We conducted a 1,505-participant online study to investigate Internet users' perceptions of OBA disclosures while performing an online task. We tested icons, accompanying taglines, and landing pages intended to inform users about OBA and provide opt-out options; these were based on prior research or drawn from those currently in use. The icons, taglines, and landing pages fell short both in terms of notifying participants about OBA and clearly informing participants about their choices. Half of the participants remembered the ads they saw but only 12% correctly remembered the disclosure taglines attached to ads. The majority of participants mistakenly believed that ads would pop up if they clicked on disclosure icons and taglines, and more participants incorrectly thought that clicking the disclosures would let them purchase their own advertisements than correctly understood that they could then opt out of OBA. " AdChoices, " the tagline most commonly used by online advertisers, was particularly ineffective at communicating notice and choice. 45% of participants who saw " AdChoices " believed that it was intended to sell advertising space, while only 27% believed it was an avenue to stop tailored ads. A majority of participants mistakenly believed that opting out would stop all online tracking, not just tailored ads. We discuss challenges in crafting disclosures, and we provide suggestions for improvement.

[1]  David M. Boush.  How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions , 1993 .

[2]  Katherine Haramundanis,et al.  Why icons cannot stand alone , 1996, ASTR.

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: An empirical study of learning and retention , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Marc Langheinrich,et al.  The platform for privacy preferences 1.0 (p3p1.0) specification , 2002 .

[5]  Angela Y. Lee.  Effects of Implicit Memory on Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Brand Choice , 2002 .

[6]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Financial privacy policies and the need for standardization , 2004, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[7]  Colin Potts,et al.  Privacy policies as decision-making tools: an evaluation of online privacy notices , 2004, CHI.

[8]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Searching for Privacy: Design and Implementation of a P3P-Enabled Search Engine , 2004, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[9]  Micael Dahlén,et al.  Brands affect slogans affect brands? Competitive interference, brand equity and the brand-slogan link , 2005 .

[10]  Christopher P. Koepke,et al.  Using multiple methods to identify theme lines for media marketing campaigns to promote Medicare information sources , 2006 .

[11]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  User interfaces for privacy agents , 2006, TCHI.

[12]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study , 2011, WEIS.

[13]  Hsiu Feng Wang,et al.  A survey of icon taxonomy used in the interface design , 2007, ECCE '07.

[14]  Maria Lorna A. Kunnath,et al.  An experimental research study on the effect of pictorial icons on a user-learner's performance , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Wen Zhang,et al.  How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? , 2009, WWW '09.

[16]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  A comparative study of online privacy policies and formats , 2009, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[17]  Aleecia M. McDonald,et al.  The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies , 2009 .

[18]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Timing is everything?: the effects of timing and placement of online privacy indicators , 2009, CHI.

[19]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  WWW 2009 MADRID! Track: Security and Privacy / Session: Web Privacy Privacy Diffusion on the Web: A Longitudinal Perspective , 2022 .

[20]  J. Turow,et al.  Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It , 2009 .

[21]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  A "nutrition label" for privacy , 2009, SOUPS.

[22]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Standardizing privacy notices: an online study of the nutrition label approach , 2010, CHI.

[23]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[25]  Aleecia M. McDonald,et al.  Beliefs and Behaviors: Internet Users' Understanding of Behavioral Advertising , 2010 .

[26]  Chris Jay Hoofnagle,et al.  Flash Cookies and Privacy , 2009, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Information Privacy Management.

[27]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis.  Demographics of Mechanical Turk , 2010 .

[28]  H. Beales,et al.  The Value of Behavioral Targeting , 2010 .

[29]  R. Shay,et al.  AdChoices? Compliance with Online Behavioral Advertising Notice and Choice Requirements. Revised Version , 2011 .

[30]  Scot Burton,et al.  Is Simpler Always Better? Consumer Evaluations of Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols , 2011 .

[31]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Designing Evidence‐based Disclosures: A Case Study of Financial Privacy Notices , 2012 .

[32]  Yang Wang,et al.  Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising , 2012, SOUPS.

[33]  Alex Wang,et al.  Visual priming of pharmaceutical advertising disclosures: effects of a motivation factor , 2012 .

[34]  Yang Wang,et al.  Why Johnny can't opt out: a usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising , 2012, CHI.

[35]  Ayman Farahat.  How effective is targeted advertising? , 2013, ACC.