Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus

Purpose: Keratoconus (KCN) is one of the most common indications of corneal transplantation in Iran. This study was conducted to determine the outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for KCN in patients operated in a private practice setting from 1994 to 2001. Methods: This longitudinal retrospective study included 164 eyes of 164 patients. Variables included preoperative keratometry, trephination and suturing techniques, donor-recipient disparity, surgical complications, immunologic rejection, graft clarity, postoperative spherical and cylindrical refractive error, keratometry, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, suture management, and the results of keratorefractive procedures. Results: Patients were followed for a mean period of 33.5 months. Mean postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at last follow-up was 0.14 ± 0.11 LogMAR (20/25); mean spherical error and mean corneal astigmatism were −0.61 ± 2.6 and 3.4 ± 1.8 D, respectively. Final visual outcomes were not significantly correlated with trephination and suturing techniques or severity of the ectasia. Although donor-recipient disparity did not affect final astigmatism, more myopic shift was observed with greater disparity, but this finding was not of statistical significance. Overall, 26.8% of the patients required keratorefractive surgery, which resulted in 2.9 D reduction in corneal astigmatism. Immunologic graft rejection occurred in 28% of cases; however, all episodes responded to medical management, and none resulted in graft failure. Conclusion: Penetrating keratoplasty is a safe and effective procedure with remarkable optical and visual outcomes for patients with keratoconus who are contact lens intolerant or have unacceptable corrected visual acuity. Neither severity of the disorder nor trephination and suturing techniques significantly affects final visual outcomes. Less graft-recipient disparity (0.25 versus 0.50 mm) seems to induce less myopic shift.

[1]  M. Gordon,et al.  Variables Affecting Rigid Contact Lens Comfort in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  B. Seitz,et al.  Impact of Preoperative Corneal Curvature on the Outcome of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus , 2003, Cornea.

[3]  G. Gamble,et al.  A Profile of Keratoconus in New Zealand , 2003, Cornea.

[4]  J. Colin,et al.  Current surgical options for keratoconus. , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  E. Cohen,et al.  Factors Associated With the Need for Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus , 2002, Cornea.

[6]  M. Gordon,et al.  Corneal Scarring and Vision in Keratoconus: A Baseline Report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study , 2000, Cornea.

[7]  R. Olson,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a long-term review of results and complications. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Diamond,et al.  Combined interrupted and continuous versus single continuous adjustable suturing in penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized study of induced astigmatism during the first postoperative year. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[10]  G. Naumann Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  K. Buzard,et al.  Corneal transplant for keratoconus: Results in early and late disease , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  U. Stenevi,et al.  The results of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[13]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  B. Marcyniuk,et al.  Prediction of refractive outcome in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 1996, Cornea.

[15]  S. Tuft,et al.  Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[16]  M. Javadi,et al.  A Comparison Between Donor-Recipient Corneal Size and Its Effect on the Ultimate Refractive Error Induced in Keratoconus , 1993, Cornea.

[17]  F. Price Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  A. Steele,et al.  Refractive surgery for graft-induced astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Marks,et al.  Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[20]  T A Casey,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: complications and long-term success. , 1991, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Hom,et al.  Clinical management of keratoconus. A multicenter analysis. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[22]  N. Ehlers,et al.  Evaluation of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus , 1988, Acta ophthalmologica.

[23]  W. Smiddy,et al.  Keratoconus: Contact Lens or Keratoplasty? , 1988 .

[24]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis and keratoconus. Allograft rejection and survival. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[25]  P. Paglen,et al.  The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 1982, Ophthalmology.