Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism

Abstract In order to create an initial framework for learning-by-teaching, this article reviews a body of relevant research, from a historical perspective, gathering evidence about the potential and the limits of this pedagogical mechanism. Results indicate that the more complex the teaching activity is, the more opportunities there are to learn by teaching. This explanatory framework may help to develop a conception of teaching and learning consistent with the Knowledge Society and to promote the incorporation and extension of practices that provide opportunities for students to learn by teaching their peers, such as cooperative learning, peer tutoring or peer assessment.

[1]  L. Mckenna,et al.  A step ahead: teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers. , 2011, Nurse education in practice.

[2]  Rod D. Roscoe Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching , 2014 .

[3]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Cooperation in the Classroom: The Jigsaw Method , 2011 .

[4]  N. Webb Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[5]  A. King Transactive Peer Tutoring: Distributing Cognition and Metacognition , 1998 .

[6]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[7]  M. Goldschmid,et al.  Peer teaching in higher education: A review , 1976 .

[8]  James M Walter,et al.  Learning Through Teaching. , 2018, Chest.

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[10]  Joachim Grzega,et al.  The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society , 2008 .

[11]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Effective peer tutoring in further and higher education , 1996 .

[12]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[13]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social psychology : an experimental approach , 1966 .

[14]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[15]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[16]  Keith Topping,et al.  Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[17]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[18]  T. Keith,et al.  The benefits of tutoring: an exploration of expectancy and outcomes , 1987 .

[19]  J. Pozo La nueva cultura del aprendizaje en la sociedad del conocimiento , 2006 .

[20]  R. Ploetzner,et al.  Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. , 1999 .

[21]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[22]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[23]  Richard A. Villa,et al.  Collaborating With Students in Instruction and Decision Making : The Untapped Resource , 2010 .

[24]  Debbie R. Robinson,et al.  Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring in Math:Outcomes and Their Design Implications , 2005 .

[25]  Evelyn Yarzebinski,et al.  Studying the Effect of a Competitive Game Show in a Learning by Teaching Environment , 2013, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[26]  Sinclair Goodlad,et al.  Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching , 1989 .

[27]  David Boud,et al.  Feedback in Higher and Professional Education : Understanding it and doing it well , 2013 .

[28]  Alan Gartner,et al.  Children teach children;: Learning by teaching , 1971 .

[29]  David Duran,et al.  Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring , 2005 .

[30]  Heidrun Allert,et al.  Lifelong learning in action , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  David W. Johnson,et al.  An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning , 2009 .

[32]  Vernon L. Allen,et al.  Children as teachers : theory and research on tutoring , 1976 .

[33]  Yael Sharan Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice , 2010 .

[34]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment , 2010 .

[35]  R. Cloward Studies in Tutoring. , 1967 .

[36]  Carles Monereo i Font,et al.  The Impact of Peer Tutoring on the Improvement of Linguistic Competence, Self-Concept as a Writer and Pedagogical Satisfaction. , 2008 .

[37]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[38]  R. Leikin,et al.  Learning Through Teaching Mathematics , 2010 .

[39]  E. Deci,et al.  Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set , 1984 .

[40]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[41]  Tia G. B. Hansen,et al.  Collaborative Learning : Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[42]  K. Topping Trends in Peer Learning , 2005 .

[43]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Instruction Based on Tutoring , 2010 .

[44]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education , 2001 .

[45]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[46]  樊希强,et al.  Cooperative Learning , 2020, Teaching High School Physics.

[47]  R. Mayer,et al.  The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy , 2013 .

[48]  L. F. Annis The processes and effects of peer tutoring. , 1983 .