Interchangeability of the Wii Balance Board for Bipedal Balance Assessment

Background Since 2010, an increasing interest in more portable and flexible hardware for balance and posture assessment led to previously published studies determining whether or not the Wii Balance Board could be used to assess balance and posture, both scientifically and clinically. However, no previous studies aimed at comparing results from different Wii Balance Boards for clinical balance evaluation exist. Objective The objective of this crossover study is to assess the interchangeability of the Wii Balance Board. Methods A total of 6 subjects participated in the study and their balance was assessed using 4 different Wii Balance Boards. Trials were recorded simultaneously with Wii Balance Boards and with a laboratory force plate. Nine relevant clinical parameters were derived from center of pressure displacement data obtained from Wii Balance Board and force plate systems. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), F tests, and Friedman tests were computed to assess the agreement between trials and to compare the Wii Balance Board and force plate results. Results Excellent correlations were found between the Wii Balance Board and force plate (mean ρ =.83). With the exception of 2 parameters, strong to excellent agreements were found for the 7 remaining parameters (ICC=.96). No significant differences were found between trials recorded with different Wii Balance Boards. Conclusions Our results indicate that for most of the parameters analyzed, balance and posture assessed with one Wii Balance Board were statistically similar to results obtained from another. Furthermore, the good correlation between the Wii Balance Board and force plate results shows that Wii Balance Boards can be reliably used for scientific assessment using most of the parameters analyzed in this study. These results also suggest that the Wii Balance Board could be used in multicenter studies and therefore, would allow for the creation of larger populations for clinical studies. Trial Registration Ethical Committee of the Erasme Hospital (CCB B406201215142).

[1]  Matthew W Bundle,et al.  Letter to the editor: On “Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance” by R.A. Clark et al. [Gait & Posture 31 (2010) 307–310]: are the conclusions stated by the authors justified? , 2014, Gait & posture.

[2]  Paul McCrory,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[3]  Marcos Duarte,et al.  Revision of posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. , 2010, Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)).

[4]  Shirley Rietdyk,et al.  Dynamic stability of a human standing on a balance board. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Marcos Duarte,et al.  Revisão sobre posturografia baseada em plataforma de força para avaliação do equilíbrio , 2010 .

[6]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Association between seated postural control and gait speed in knee osteoarthritis. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[7]  Daniel J Goble,et al.  An Alternative to the Balance Error Scoring System: Using a Low-Cost Balance Board to Improve the Validity/Reliability of Sports-Related Concussion Balance Testing , 2014, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[8]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Comparison of a laboratory grade force platform with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board on measurement of postural control in single-leg stance balance tasks. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.