A wire-cylinder-plate electrode configuration is presented to generate ionic wind with a dc corona discharge in air at atmospheric pressure. The objective of the work is to maximize the power supplied to the flow in order to increase acceleration while avoiding breakdown. Thus, the proposed experimental setup addresses the problem of decoupling the mechanism of ion generation from that of ion acceleration. Using a wire-plate configuration as a reference, we have focused on improving the topography of the electric field to (1) separate the ionization and acceleration zones in space, and (2) guide the trajectory of charged particles as parallel to the median axis as possible. In the proposed wire-cylinder-plate setup, a dc corona discharge is generated in the space between a wire and two cylinders. The ions produced by the corona then drift past the cylinders and into a channel between two plates, where they undergo acceleration. To maximize the ionic wind it is found that the geometric configuration must be as compact as possible and that the voltage applied must be right below breakdown. Experimentally, the optimized wire-plate reference setup provides a maximum flow velocity of 8 m s−1, a flow rate per unit electrode length of 0.034 m2 s−1, and a thrust per unit electrode length of 0.24 N m−1. The wire-cylinder-plate configuration provides a maximum flow velocity of 10 m s−1, a flow rate per unit electrode length of 0.041 m2 s−1, and a thrust per unit electrode length of 0.35 N m−1. This 46% increase in thrust is obtained by increasing the electric power per unit electrode length by only 16% (from 175 to 210 W m−1), which confirms the gain in efficiency obtained with the decoupled system. In comparison with a simple wire-wire corona configuration, the wire-cylinder-plate configuration increases the ionic wind velocity by up to a factor of 3, and the thrust by an order of magnitude.
[1]
Kinetic Equation for Electrons in a Weakly Ionized Gas Placed in an Electric Field
,
1991
.
[2]
Iu. P. Raizer.
Gas Discharge Physics
,
1991
.
[3]
L. C. Pitchford,et al.
Electrohydrodynamic force and aerodynamic flow acceleration in surface dielectric barrier discharge
,
2005
.
[4]
Thomas Corke,et al.
Unsteady Plasma Actuators for Separation Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Blades
,
2006
.
[5]
E. Moreau,et al.
Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control
,
2007
.
[6]
Modelling wire-to-wire corona discharge action on aerodynamics and comparison with experiment
,
2008
.
[7]
Guillermo Artana,et al.
Electric wind produced by surface plasma actuators: a new dielectric barrier discharge based on a three-electrode geometry
,
2008
.
[8]
Gabriele Neretti,et al.
Experimental investigation of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators driven by repetitive high-voltage nanosecond pulses with dc or low frequency sinusoidal bias
,
2008
.
[9]
F. Thomas,et al.
Optimization of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Active Aerodynamic Flow Control
,
2009
.
[10]
Huu Duc Vo,et al.
Performance Improvement of Axial Compressors and Fans with Plasma Actuation
,
2009
.
[11]
T. Corke,et al.
Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma enhanced aerodynamics: physics, modeling and applications
,
2009
.