Development and Comparative Evaluation of New Shapes of Pillows

The purpose of this study was to determine pillow designs suitable for supine and side-lying positions. [Subjects] Twenty female and twenty male subjects with a mean age of 22.7 years (SD = 1.3) participated in the study. [Methods] First, a three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze the movements of the head and the shoulder joints during changes from supine positions to side-lying positions. Second, the height from the face to the shoulder and the height from the floor to the middle of the neck in a side-lying position were measured. Third, the weight distribution ratios of the head and the trunk were compared using general pillows (polyester sponge), memory foam, and prototype pillows. [Results] During position changes from supine positions to side-lying positions, the head moved in a fan shape, and the shoulder joint moved an average of 4.4 cm upward. The height from the face to the shoulder was 9 cm on average. The height from the floor to the middle of the neck was 11 cm on average. The weight distribution ratios between the head and the trunk were compared among general pillows (polyester sponge), memory foam, and prototype pillows. The results showed significant differences in the side-lying position. [Conclusion] Pillows with uniform heights are not suitable for a supine or side-lying position. In the case of both positions, users should be allowed to select pillows in shapes that can support the neck.

[1]  L. Persson,et al.  Neck support pillows: a comparative study. , 1998, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[2]  P. Meerlo,et al.  Restricted and disrupted sleep: effects on autonomic function, neuroendocrine stress systems and stress responsivity. , 2008, Sleep medicine reviews.

[3]  C. Palazzi,et al.  Effects of two types of pillows on bilateral sternocleidomastoid EMG activity in healthy subjects and in patients with myogenic cranio-cervical-mandibular dysfunction. , 1999, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[4]  T. Palermo,et al.  Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with insomnia in adolescents with chronic pain , 2011, PAIN®.

[5]  J. Krueger,et al.  Why we sleep: a theoretical view of sleep function. , 1999, Sleep medicine reviews.

[6]  R. Bootzin,et al.  Derivation of research diagnostic criteria for insomnia: report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Work Group. , 2004, Sleep.

[7]  K V Kuhlemeier,et al.  Cervical pain: a comparison of three pillows. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Karen Grimmer-Somers,et al.  Pillow use: the behaviour of cervical pain, sleep quality and pillow comfort in side sleepers. , 2009, Manual therapy.

[9]  Shuo-Fang Liu,et al.  Shape design of an optimal comfortable pillow based on the analytic hierarchy process method. , 2011, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[10]  S. Kyle,et al.  Insomnia and health-related quality of life. , 2010, Sleep medicine reviews.

[11]  Linda C. Li,et al.  A comparison of three types of neck support in fibromyalgia patients. , 1998, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[12]  Parham Erfanian,et al.  Assessing effects of a semi-customized experimental cervical pillow on symptomatic adults with chronic neck pain with and without headache. , 2004, The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association.

[13]  Dionne Ryder MSc Mcsp Mmacp Rehabilitation of the Spine , 2000 .