Incorporation of imprecise goal vectors into evolutionary multi-objective optimization

Preference-based techniques in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA) are gaining importance. This paper presents a method of representing, eliciting and integrating decision making preference expressed as a set of imprecise goal vectors into a MOEA with steady-state replacement. The specification of a precise goal vector without extensive knowledge of problem behavior often leads to undesirable results. The approach proposed in this paper facilitates the linguistic specification of goal vectors relative to extreme, non-dominated solutions (i.e. the goal is specified as ”Very Small”, ”Small”, ”Medium”, ”Large”, and ”Very Large”) with three degrees of imprecision as desired by the decision maker. The degree of imprecision corresponds to the density of solutions desired within the target subset. Empirical investigations of the proposed method yield promising results.

[1]  K. Deb Solving goal programming problems using multi-objective genetic algorithms , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[2]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  A Methodological Guide to Multiobjective Optimization , 1980 .

[3]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[4]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms. I. A unified formulation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[6]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2006, GECCO.

[8]  E. F. Khor,et al.  An Evolutionary Algorithm with Advanced Goal and Priority Specification for Multi-objective Optimization , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[9]  Lily Rachmawati,et al.  An efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with steady-state replacement model , 2006, GECCO '06.

[10]  C. Fonseca,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHMS FOR MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION: FORMULATION, DISCUSSION, AND GENERALIZATION , 1993 .

[11]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.