Confusion or Enlightenment?

Recent research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between interpersonal discussion and media use in the production of political knowledge. This study seeks to better illuminate this relationship by introducing political disagreement as an additional moderator. Using nationally representative survey data collected during the 2000 primary campaign, the authors find a negative interaction between discussion frequency and disagreement in predicting knowledge of candidate issue positions. This suggests either that the benefits of frequent discussion are stronger for those whose discussion networks are composed of like-minded others or that disagreement facilitates learning only at low levels of discussion frequency. Results also demonstrate that frequent discussion enhances the relationship between debate viewing and issue knowledge among those who reside in politically homogenous networks. In diverse networks, however, the relationship between debate viewing and issue knowledge is weaker for those who regularly talk about politics than those who talk less. Political disagreement is unassociated with knowledge of candidates' personal backgrounds.

[1]  R. Mcclure,et al.  The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics , 1976 .

[2]  David L Streiner,et al.  Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[3]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Political Talk as a Catalyst for Online Citizenship , 2004 .

[4]  J. David Kennamer.  Political Discussion and Cognition: A 1988 Look , 1990 .

[5]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  Intramedia Mediation: The Cumulative and Complementary Effects of News Media Use , 2005 .

[6]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[7]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue , 1999 .

[8]  Alexis S. Tan.  Mass Media Use, Issue Knowledge and Political Involvement , 1980 .

[9]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and Newspapers , 1996 .

[10]  William L. Benoit.  The Primary Decision: A Functional Analysis of Debates in Presidential Primaries , 2001 .

[11]  Robert O. Wyatt,et al.  Bridging the spheres: political and personal conversation in public and private spaces , 2000 .

[12]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Erratum: Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement (Communication Research (2005) 32:1) , 2005 .

[13]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[14]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  American journalism and the decline in event‐centered reporting , 1997 .

[15]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Interpersonal Communication and News Comprehension , 1986 .

[16]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[17]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[18]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[19]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  On the Importance of Marginality: One More Step into the Two-Step Flow of Communication , 1982 .

[20]  Communication of Political Information during Early Presidential Primaries: Cognition, Affect, and Uncertainty. , 1981 .

[21]  H. Haja Mydin.  On Liberty , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  R. Lance Holbert,et al.  The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry , 2002 .

[23]  J. P. Eveland.  The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[24]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[25]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[26]  L. Cronbach.  Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[27]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[28]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[29]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation , 2000 .

[30]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News , 1986 .

[31]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and their Implications for Participatory Behavior , 2002, Commun. Res..

[32]  D. Weaver,et al.  Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter? , 2001 .

[33]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .

[34]  A. Velthuijsen,et al.  Participation in conversations about the news. , 2001 .

[35]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[36]  Dietram A. Scheufele.  Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy , 2000 .

[37]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data , 2005 .

[38]  J. Habermas.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 1962 .

[39]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Community Integration, Local Media Use, and Democratic Processes , 1996 .

[40]  Mark I. Appelbaum,et al.  Nonorthogonal analysis of variance--once again. , 1980 .

[41]  William L. Benoit,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates , 2003 .

[42]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  Christopher E. Beaudoin.  The Independent and Interactive Antecedents of International Knowledge , 2004 .

[44]  H. Arendt.  Truth and Politics , 2008 .

[45]  John M. Levine,et al.  Impact of Anticipated Interaction on Information Acquisition , 1995 .

[46]  Staci L. Rhine,et al.  Political Talk Over Here, Over There, Over Time , 2000, British Journal of Political Science.

[47]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[48]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[49]  Dan G. Drew,et al.  Voter Learning in the 1990 Off-Year Election: Did the Media Matter? , 1993 .

[50]  Dan G. Drew,et al.  Voter Learning in the 1992 Presidential Election: Did the “Nontraditional” Media and Debates Matter? , 1995 .

[51]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[52]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Benjamin R. Barber,et al.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[54]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1996 .

[55]  Silvo Lenart,et al.  Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media , 1994 .

[56]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[57]  M. Kingwell.  A civil tongue : justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism , 1995 .

[58]  Xinshu Zhao,et al.  Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992 , 1994 .