Comparison of airborne hyperspectral data and EO-1 Hyperion for mineral mapping

Airborne hyperspectral data have been available to researchers since the early 1980s and their use for geologic applications is well documented. The launch of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Earth Observing 1 Hyperion sensor in November 2000 marked the establishment of a test bed for spaceborne hyperspectral capabilities. Hyperion covers the 0.4-2.5-/spl mu/m range with 242 spectral bands at approximately 10-nm spectral resolution and 30-m spatial resolution. Analytical Imaging and Geophysics LLC and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation have been involved in efforts to evaluate, validate, and demonstrate Hyperions's utility for geologic mapping in a variety of sites in the United States and around the world. Initial results over several sites with established ground truth and years of airborne hyperspectral data show that Hyperion data from the shortwave infrared spectrometer can be used to produce useful geologic (mineralogic) information. Minerals mapped include carbonates, chlorite, epidote, kaolinite, alunite, buddingtonite, muscovite, hydrothermal silica, and zeolite. Hyperion data collected under optimum conditions (summer season, bright targets, well-exposed geology) indicate that Hyperion data meet prelaunch specifications and allow subtle distinctions such as determining the difference between calcite and dolomite and mapping solid solution differences in micas caused by substitution in octahedral molecular sites. Comparison of airborne hyperspectral data [from the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS)] to the Hyperion data establishes that Hyperion provides similar basic mineralogic information, with the principal limitation being limited mapping of fine spectral detail under less-than-optimum acquisition conditions (winter season, dark targets) based on lower signal-to-noise ratios. Case histories demonstrate the analysis methodologies and level of information available from the Hyperion data. They also show the viability of Hyperion as a means of extending hyperspectral mineral mapping to areas not accessible to aircraft sensors. The analysis results demonstrate that spaceborne hyperspectral sensors can produce useful mineralogic information, but also indicate that SNR improvements are required for future spaceborne sensors to allow the same level of mapping that is currently possible from airborne sensors such as AVIRIS.

[1]  Jessica A. Faust,et al.  Aviris Radiometric Laboratory Calibration, Inflight Validation and a Focused Sensitivity Analysis in 1998 , 2000 .

[2]  G. Swayze.  The hydrothermal and structural history of the Cuprite mining district, southwestern Nevada: An integrated geological and geophysical approach , 1997 .

[3]  Robert O. Green,et al.  On-orbit radiometric and spectral calibration characteristics of EO-1 Hyperion derived with an underflight of AVIRIS and in situ measurements at Salar de Arizaro, Argentina , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  J. Boardman,et al.  Mineral mapping at Cuprite, Nevada with a 63-channel imaging spectrometer , 1990 .

[5]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  Comparison of EO-1 Hyperion and airborne hyperspectral remote sensing data for geologic applications , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[6]  A. B. Lefkoff,et al.  Expert system-based mineral mapping in northern death valley, California/Nevada, using the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1993 .

[7]  Michael Abrams,et al.  Alteration mapping using multispectral images; Cuprite mining district, Esmeralda County, Nevada , 1980 .

[8]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  Knowledge‐based geologic mapping with imaging spectrometers , 1994 .

[9]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[10]  J. Boardman.  Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts , 1993 .

[11]  A F Goetz,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry for Earth Remote Sensing , 1985, Science.

[12]  J. W. Boardman,et al.  Characterization and mapping of kimberlites and related diatremes using hyperspectral remote sensing , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[13]  J. W. Boardman,et al.  FIFTEEN YEARS OF HYPERSPECTRAL DATA: NORTHERN GRAPEVINE MOUNTAINS, NEVADA , 1999 .

[14]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[15]  John B. Adams,et al.  Detectability of minerals on desert alluvial fans using reflectance spectra , 1987 .

[16]  Gary L. Raines,et al.  Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Little Sand Spring Wilderness Study Area, Inyo County, California , 1984 .

[17]  A. F. H. Goetz,et al.  Mineralogical Mapping in the Cuprite Mining District, Nevada , 1985 .

[18]  J. D. Dykstra,et al.  Analysis of AIS Data of the Recluse Oil Field, Recluse, Wyoming , 1985 .

[19]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  Ground-truthing AVIRIS mineral mapping at Cuprite, Nevada , 1992 .

[20]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[21]  R. Clark,et al.  High spectral resolution reflectance spectroscopy of minerals , 1990 .

[22]  J. Boardman,et al.  Leveraging the High Dimensionality of AVIRIS Data for improved Sub-Pixel Target i Unmixing and Rejection of False Positives : Mixture Tuned Matched Filtering , 1998 .

[23]  F. Kruse.  Use of airborne imaging spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern grapevine mountains, Nevada, and California , 1988 .