Stochastic and Deterministic Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty and Variability Reserves for High Renewable Integration

The uncertain and variable nature of renewable energy sources in modern power systems raises significant challenges in achieving the dual objective of reliable and economically efficient system operation. To address these challenges, advanced scheduling strategies have evolved during the past years, including the co-optimization of energy and reserves under deterministic or stochastic Unit Commitment (UC) modeling frameworks. This paper presents different deterministic and stochastic day-ahead UC formulations, with focus on the determination, allocation and deployment of reserves. An explicit distinction is proposed between the uncertainty and the variability reserve, capturing the twofold nature of renewable generation. The concept of multi-timing scheduling is proposed and applied in all UC policies, which allows for the optimal procurement of such reserves based on intra-hourly (real-time) intervals, when concurrently optimizing energy and commitments over hourly intervals. The day-ahead scheduling results are tested against different real-time dispatch regimes, with none or limited look-ahead capability, or with the use of the variability reserve, utilizing a modified version of the Greek power system. The results demonstrate the enhanced reliability achieved by applying the multi-timing scheduling concept and explicitly considering the variability reserve, and certain features regarding the allocation and deployment of reserves are discussed.

[1]  Erik Ela,et al.  The evolution of wind power integration studies: Past, present, and future , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Enhanced Forecasting Approach for Electricity Market Prices and Wind Power Data Series in the Short-Term , 2016 .

[3]  W.L. Kling,et al.  Impacts of Wind Power on Thermal Generation Unit Commitment and Dispatch , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[4]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Robin Girard,et al.  Evaluating the quality of scenarios of short-term wind power generation , 2012 .

[6]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Scheduling and Pricing for Expected Ramp Capability in Real-Time Power Markets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  An Integrated Scheduling Approach to Underpin Flexibility in European Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[8]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[9]  John M. Wilson,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Nivad Navid,et al.  Market Solutions for Managing Ramp Flexibility With High Penetration of Renewable Resource , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[11]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  Multiple Time Resolution Unit Commitment for Short-Term Operations Scheduling Under High Renewable Penetration , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  A. Conejo,et al.  Market-clearing with stochastic security - part II: case studies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[13]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Allocation of Hourly Reserve Versus Demand Response for Security-Constrained Scheduling of Stochastic Wind Energy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[14]  N. Menemenlis,et al.  Computation of Dynamic Operating Balancing Reserve for Wind Power Integration for the Time-Horizon 1–48 Hours , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  Congcong Wang,et al.  Requirement design for a reliable and efficient ramp capability product , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  M. Rothleder,et al.  Enhanced system reliability using flexible ramp constraint in CAISO market , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[17]  A. Papalexopoulos,et al.  Pricing energy and ancillary services in integrated market systems by an optimal power flow , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Xi-Yuan Ma,et al.  Scenario Generation of Wind Power Based on Statistical Uncertainty and Variability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[19]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  E. Ela,et al.  Studying the Variability and Uncertainty Impacts of Variable Generation at Multiple Timescales , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  Multiple Time Resolution Stochastic Scheduling for Systems With High Renewable Penetration , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network , 2013, Oper. Res..

[23]  Viktoria Neimane,et al.  Using Standard Deviation as a Measure of Increased Operational Reserve Requirement for Wind Power , 2008 .

[24]  H. Madsen,et al.  From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production , 2009 .

[25]  C.R. Philbrick,et al.  Modeling Approaches for Computational Cost Reduction in Stochastic Unit Commitment Formulations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Mark Rothleder,et al.  Recognition of extended dispatch horizons in California's energy markets , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[27]  F. Bouffard,et al.  Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[28]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Effect of time resolution on unit commitment decisions in systems with high wind penetration , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[29]  M A Matos,et al.  Setting the Operating Reserve Using Probabilistic Wind Power Forecasts , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[30]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  A. Conejo,et al.  Economic Valuation of Reserves in Power Systems With High Penetration of Wind Power , 2009 .

[32]  Alan G. Isemonger,et al.  The evolving design of RTO ancillary service markets , 2009 .

[33]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  A flexible ramping product: Can it help real-time dispatch markets approach the stochastic dispatch ideal? , 2014 .

[34]  Silvano Martello,et al.  Decision Making under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[35]  Beibei Wang,et al.  Unit Commitment Model Considering Flexible Scheduling of Demand Response for High Wind Integration , 2015 .

[36]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[38]  Christoph Maurer,et al.  Dimensioning of secondary and tertiary control reserve by probabilistic methods , 2009 .

[39]  M. Lange On the Uncertainty of Wind Power Predictions—Analysis of the Forecast Accuracy and Statistical Distribution of Errors , 2005 .

[40]  Ying-Yi Hong,et al.  Hour-Ahead Wind Speed and Power Forecasting Using Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2013 .

[41]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  Dynamic reserves quantification for variable time resolution scheduling , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[42]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  Optimal Self-Scheduling of a Thermal Producer in Short-Term Electricity Markets by MILP , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[43]  Michael Milligan,et al.  Operating Reserves and Variable Generation , 2011 .

[44]  R. Baldick,et al.  A frequency-constrained stochastic economic dispatch model , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[45]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Real-Time Markets for Flexiramp: A Stochastic Unit Commitment-Based Analysis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[46]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  A General Probabilistic Forecasting Framework for Offshore Wind Power Fluctuations , 2012 .

[47]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  The “Weather Intelligence for Renewable Energies” Benchmarking Exercise on Short-Term Forecasting of Wind and Solar Power Generation , 2015 .

[48]  Brian Ó Gallachóir,et al.  The impact of sub-hourly modelling in power systems with significant levels of renewable generation , 2014 .

[49]  Jae-Kun Lyu,et al.  Cost Analysis Method for Estimating Dynamic Reserve Considering Uncertainties in Supply and Demand , 2016 .

[50]  G. Strbac,et al.  Efficient Stochastic Scheduling for Simulation of Wind-Integrated Power Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[51]  Ibrahim Krad,et al.  Quantifying the Potential Impacts of Flexibility Reserve on Power System Operations , 2015, 2015 Seventh Annual IEEE Green Technologies Conference.

[52]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Thermal Generation Flexibility With Ramping Costs and Hourly Demand Response in Stochastic Security-Constrained Scheduling of Variable Energy Sources , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[53]  Christopher Heard,et al.  Wind Speed Prediction Using a Univariate ARIMA Model and a Multivariate NARX Model , 2016 .