The Zernike Expansion - An Example of a Merit Function for 2D/3D Registration Based on Orthogonal Functions

Current merit functions for 2D/3D registration usually rely on comparing pixels or small regions of images using some sort of statistical measure. Problems connected to this paradigm the sometimes problematic behaviour of the method if noise or artefacts (for instance a guide wire) are present on the projective image. We present a merit function for 2D/3D registration which utilizes the decomposition of the X-ray and the DRR under comparison into orthogonal Zernike moments; the quality of the match is assessed by an iterative comparison of expansion coefficients. Results in a imaging study on a physical phantom show that--compared to standard cross--correlation the Zernike moment based merit function shows better robustness if histogram content in images under comparison is different, and that time expenses are comparable if the merit function is constructed out of a few significant moments only.

[1]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  3D/2D Image Registration: The Impact of X-Ray Views and Their Number , 2007, MICCAI.

[2]  Eric C. Kintner,et al.  On the Mathematical Properties of the Zernike Polynomials , 1976 .

[3]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Wobbled splatting—a fast perspective volume rendering method for simulation of x-ray images from CT , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  A faster method for 3D/2D medical image registration—a simulation study , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  von F. Zernike Beugungstheorie des schneidenver-fahrens und seiner verbesserten form, der phasenkontrastmethode , 1934 .

[6]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Fast DRR splat rendering using common consumer graphics hardware. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  Invariant Image Recognition by Zernike Moments , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  D. R. Fish,et al.  A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Kettenbach,et al.  Rigid 2D/3D slice-to-volume registration and its application on fluoroscopic CT images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Chee-Way Chong,et al.  A comparative analysis of algorithms for fast computation of Zernike moments , 2003, Pattern Recognit..