Unsigned surprise but not reward magnitude modulates the integration of motor elements during actions

[1]  V. Roessner,et al.  Theta Activity Dynamics during Embedded Response Plan Processing in Tourette Syndrome , 2023, Biomedicines.

[2]  W. Gerstner,et al.  A taxonomy of surprise definitions , 2022, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[3]  C. Beste,et al.  Processing of embedded response plans is modulated by an interplay of fronto-parietal theta and beta activity. , 2022, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Frings,et al.  Illuminating the prefrontal neural correlates of action sequence disassembling in response–response binding , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Julius Verrel,et al.  Tourette syndrome as a motor disorder revisited – Evidence from action coding , 2021, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[6]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Neurophysiology of embedded response plans: age effects in action execution but not in feature integration from pre-adolescence to adulthood. , 2021, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  L. Colzato,et al.  Short-term Focused Attention Meditation Restricts the Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Bindings to Relevant Information , 2021, Mindfulness.

[8]  Yael Niv,et al.  Signed and unsigned reward prediction errors dynamically enhance learning and memory , 2021, eLife.

[9]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning , 2020, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[11]  B. Hommel,et al.  The Downsides of Cognitive Enhancement , 2020, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Dopamine modulates subcortical responses to surprising sounds , 2020, PLoS biology.

[13]  Paul C Fletcher,et al.  Dopamine, Prediction Error and Beyond , 2020, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[15]  L. Colzato,et al.  The Role of DRD1 and DRD2 Receptors for Response Selection Under Varying Complexity Levels: Implications for Metacontrol Processes , 2019, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[16]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Behavioural and neural signatures of perceptual decision-making are modulated by pupil-linked arousal , 2019, eLife.

[17]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The impact of stimulus uncertainty on attentional control , 2019, Cognition.

[18]  C. Beste,et al.  Striatal Microstructure and Its Relevance for Cognitive Control , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  The system‐neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual–attentional conflicts during auditory processing , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Heinrich René Liesefeld,et al.  Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?) , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[21]  B. Hommel,et al.  The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[22]  Peter R Murphy,et al.  Pupil Diameter Tracks Lapses of Attention , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  Roshan Cools,et al.  The costs and benefits of brain dopamine for cognitive control. , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[24]  Wolfram Schultz,et al.  Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Cisek,et al.  Modulation of Premotor and Primary Motor Cortical Activity during Volitional Adjustments of Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Hommel.  Between Persistence and Flexibility: The Yin and Yang of Action Control , 2015 .

[27]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Nonspecific Inhibition of the Motor System during Response Preparation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Goschke,et al.  Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: The role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Joshua W. Brown.  Beyond Conflict Monitoring , 2013, Current directions in psychological science.

[30]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .

[31]  John T. Serences,et al.  Exploring the relationship between perceptual learning and top-down attentional control , 2012, Vision Research.

[32]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Aging-Related Increases in Behavioral Variability: Relations to Losses of Dopamine D1 Receptors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  John M. Pearson,et al.  Surprise Signals in Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Neuronal Encoding of Unsigned Reward Prediction Errors Driving Adjustment in Behavior , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  P. Glimcher.  Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor binding modulates intraindividual variability in episodic recognition and executive functioning , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  B. Hommel.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[37]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 2001 .

[38]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intra-individual variability in behavior: links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  W. Schultz,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Reward Value by Dopamine Neurons , 2005, Science.

[40]  B. Hommel.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  S. Sikström,et al.  Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[43]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Gain Modulation A Major Computational Principle of the Central Nervous System , 2000, Neuron.

[44]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes , 1999 .

[45]  A. Treisman.  The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  J D Cohen,et al.  A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. , 1990, Science.

[47]  R. Snow,et al.  Review of the Evidence. , 1964, Science.

[48]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  The Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise: A Review of the Evidence , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[49]  C. Frings,et al.  From Simple to Complex Actions: Response–Response Bindings as a New Approach to Action Sequences , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  William H. Alexander,et al.  The Role of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Prediction Error and Signaling Surprise , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Nathaniel D. Daw,et al.  Value Learning through Reinforcement , 2014 .

[52]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[53]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.