Worldwide Argus II implantation: recommendations to optimize patient outcomes

BackgroundA position paper based on the collective experiences of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System investigators to review strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with retinitis pigmentosa undergoing retinal prosthesis implantation.MethodsRetinal surgeons, device programmers, and rehabilitation specialists from Europe, Canada, Middle East, and the United States were convened to the first international Argus II Investigator Meeting held in Ann Arbor, MI in March 2015. The recommendations from the collective experiences were collected. Factors associated with successful outcomes were determined.ResultsFactors leading to successful outcomes begin with appropriate patient selection, expectation counseling, and preoperative retinal assessment. Challenges to surgical implantation include presence of staphyloma and inadequate Tenon’s capsule or conjunctiva. Modified surgical technique may reduce risks of complications such as hypotony and conjunctival erosion. Rehabilitation efforts and correlation with validated outcome measures following implantation are critical.ConclusionsBringing together Argus II investigators allowed the identification of strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Establishing an on-line collaborative network will foster coordinated research efforts to advance outcome assessment and rehabilitation strategies.

[1]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  In vitro activation of retinal cells: estimating location of stimulated cell by using a mathematical model , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Dyonne T Hartong,et al.  Retinitis pigmentosa , 2009 .

[4]  A. J. Roman,et al.  Inner retinal abnormalities in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa with RPGR mutations. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Preliminary 6 month results from the argustm ii epiretinal prosthesis feasibility study , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Rao,et al.  Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  L. Hickson,et al.  Defining and evaluating success in paediatric cochlear implantation--an exploratory study. , 2012, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[10]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[11]  A. M. Tharpe,et al.  Rehabilitation and educational considerations for children with cochlear implants. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[12]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.

[13]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  Vasyl Druchkiv,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism ≤ 0.75 Diopter combined with low myopia: a retrospective data analysis , 2014, BMC Ophthalmology.

[15]  Stanislao Rizzo,et al.  The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis: 12-month outcomes from a single-study center. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Sahel,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients , 2014, BMC Ophthalmology.

[17]  Joe Zhong,et al.  The Argus II prosthesis facilitates reaching and grasping tasks: a case series , 2014, BMC Ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Massof,et al.  Psychometric properties of the PLoVR ultra-low vision (ULV) questionnaire , 2014 .

[19]  J. Sahel,et al.  Five-year data from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Tria , 2015 .

[20]  Twenty Questions: An adaptive version of the PLoVR ultra-low vision (ULV) questionnaire , 2015 .

[21]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.