An Action Learning Approach to Changing Teaching Practice Using Group Reflection on Student and Graduate Feedback

We present a model for a collaborative activity intended to promote scholarship of teaching through small-group discussion of feedback from students. Reflection on teaching is often a lone activity and this is reflected in the paucity of literature on group reflection, however literature suggests that lone reflection on teaching can fail to conform entrenched attitudes. This paper describes the process by which we collected data on students, and former students learning experiences; prepared the qualitative data for discussion by cross-institutional groups; structured the discussion activities to maintain focus on cultural change; and evaluated the activities’ impact. The activity was carried out as part of our ALTC-supported project’s first academic forum and repeated during the second forum, with refinements to the procedure based on evaluation of the first activity. Data collected for evaluation of the first and second iterations of the activity suggests that it is an effective strategy for the promotion of scholarship of teaching and the associated development and implementation of changes to teaching practice.

[1]  Ellen Jansen,et al.  Curriculum mapping: integrating multiple perspectives on curriculum. , 2007 .

[2]  James E. McLean,et al.  Integrating Technology into Teacher Education Through Curriculum Mapping: An Update on Year Two , 2004 .

[3]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[4]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil Science teaching principles , 2011 .

[5]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[6]  Judithe Sheard,et al.  Towards a gender inclusive information and communications technology curriculum: a perspective from graduates in the workforce , 2010, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[7]  S. R. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Mid-Semester Student Feedback Enhances Student Learning , 2006 .

[8]  R. Harden,et al.  AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning , 2001, Medical teacher.

[9]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[10]  L. Eby.  Book Review: Survey Research Methods, 3rd ed., by Floyd J. Fowler Jr. (2002). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage. , 2003 .

[11]  P. Chandler,et al.  Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory , 1991 .

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[13]  Keith Trigwell *,et al.  Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching , 2004 .

[14]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum , 2004 .

[15]  Caroline Wachtler,et al.  A hidden curriculum: mapping cultural competency in a medical programme , 2003, Medical education.

[16]  A. Jersild.  Primacy, recency, frequency, and vividness. , 1929 .

[17]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[18]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[19]  Garry Hoban,et al.  Making Practice Problematic: Listening to student interviews as a catalyst for teacher reflection , 2000 .

[20]  Fazel Naghdy,et al.  What our ICT graduates really need from us: a perspective from the workplace , 2009, ACE '09.

[21]  Fazel Naghdy,et al.  The case for ICT work-integrated learning from graduates in the workplace , 2010, ACE '10.

[22]  Cecilia M. Plaza,et al.  Curriculum mapping in program assessment and evaluation. , 2007, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[23]  S. Brookfield.  Becoming a critically reflective teacher , 1995 .

[24]  Lynn Fendler,et al.  Teacher Reflection in a Hall of Mirrors: Historical Influences and Political Reverberations , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Change forces : the sequel , 2005 .

[26]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[27]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[28]  J..  EFFECTIVE REFLECTIVE PRACTICE IN SEARCH OF MEANING IN LEARNING ABOUT TEACHING , 2011 .

[29]  Garry Hoban,et al.  Developing different forms of student feedback to promote teacher reflection: A 10-year collaboration , 2006 .

[30]  S. Brookfield.  Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1995 .

[31]  L. Andresen.  A Useable, Trans-Disciplinary Conception of Scholarship , 2000 .

[32]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[33]  Daniel J. Marcucci.  Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7a ed.). New York: Routledge. , 2011 .

[34]  M. Healey.  Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education: A discipline-based approach , 2000 .

[35]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[36]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[37]  김정희,et al.  사회사업에서의 Participatory Action Research(PAR)와 Action Research(AR) 모델 적용 필요성에 관한 연구 , 2005 .