Environmental and economic implications of energy efficiency in new residential buildings: A multi-criteria selection approach

Abstract The choice of the most appropriate technologies in buildings is often a challenge at the design stage, especially when many different criteria are taken into account. Consequently, the decision process relies often on one criterion only, such as costs or energy savings. We propose a multi-criteria approach based on multi-attribute utility theory to assess alternative energy efficiency measures, explicitly considering both environmental and economic criteria. We apply it to the design of a new residential building in Milan (Italy), with the aim to maximize CO2 emission savings related to electricity and gas consumption, and to minimize embodied energy and investment costs. After modelling the building prototype, alternative energy efficiency measures are assessed and ranked according to the selected criteria. The building optimized through the implementation of the best performing measures showed an overall 90% reduction in operational primary energy compared to the baseline building. The inclusion of the embodied energy altered the energy performance calculations resulting in 55–67% reduction in total energy over a 10-year period, and 77–82% over a 30-year period. Results point to the importance of a comprehensive implementation of measures, such as thermal improvements, high efficiency equipment, appliances, and renewable energy generation. The paper demonstrates the feasibility of this framework to support the decision process from a multi-criteria perspective, proposing a flexible method that can be adapted to other building types, environmental conditions, materials and technologies. It also highlights the importance of considering both environmental and economic criteria when designing a new building. It stresses how the embodied energy should be a criterion for technology selection, as current strategies to reduce operational energy often increase the amount of energy embodied into buildings with environmental consequences.

[1]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials , 2008 .

[2]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  A framework for the integrated optimisation of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of buildings , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[3]  Delia D’Agostino,et al.  What is a Nearly zero energy building? Overview, implementation and comparison of definitions , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[4]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[5]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Decision-making process for improving thermal and energy performance of residential buildings: A case study of constructive systems in Brazil , 2016 .

[6]  Jacek Żak,et al.  Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV methods to multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of urban transportation projects , 2015 .

[7]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[8]  G. Heravi,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision-making method for optimal selection of sustainable industrial building options focused on petrochemical projects , 2017 .

[9]  Nashwan Dawood,et al.  Designing low carbon buildings : a framework to reduce energy consumption and embed the use of renewables , 2013 .

[10]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[11]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[12]  Danny S. Parker,et al.  A framework for the cost-optimal design of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs) in representative climates across Europe , 2018 .

[13]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Prototyping the Next Generation EnergyPlus Simulation Engine , 2015, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[14]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  Embodied Energy and Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Review in Residential Buildings , 2017 .

[15]  Pascal Henry Biwole,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization Methodology for Net Zero Energy Buildings , 2018 .

[16]  Teresa M. Mata,et al.  LCA of constructing an industrial building: focus on embodied carbon and energy , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[17]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of refurbishment strategies for historic buildings , 2013 .

[18]  Esther H. K. Yung,et al.  Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects , 2018, Sustainability.

[19]  L. D. Danny Harvey,et al.  Net climatic impact of solid foam insulation produced with halocarbon and non-halocarbon blowing agents , 2007 .

[20]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[21]  Amar Bennadji,et al.  A multi-criteria group decision-making method for the thermal renovation of masonry buildings: The case of Algeria , 2016 .

[22]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluation of process- and input-output-based life cycle inventory data with regard to truncation and aggregation issues. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  DongHun Yeo,et al.  Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization , 2011 .

[25]  Steve Goodhew,et al.  A Decision Making System for Selecting Sustainable Technologies for Retail Buildings , 2013 .

[26]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[27]  Zachary A. Collier,et al.  Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach , 2013, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[28]  Antonio García-Martínez,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review , 2017 .

[29]  Alexandre Szklo,et al.  Optimization model for evaluating on-site renewable technologies with storage in zero/nearly zero energy buildings , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[30]  Jin Si,et al.  Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method , 2016 .

[31]  Luis Fabián Fuentes-Cortés,et al.  Integration of distributed generation technologies on sustainable buildings , 2018 .

[32]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2009 .

[33]  Shady Attia,et al.  Strategic Decision Making For Zero Energy Buildings in Hot Climates , 2010 .

[34]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Truncation Error Estimates in Process Life Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Analysis , 2018 .

[35]  Delia D׳Agostino,et al.  Assessment of the progress towards the establishment of definitions of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) in European Member States , 2015 .

[36]  Thomas Olofsson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization of Life-Cycle Energy and Cost Using a BIM-Based Master Model , 2019, Sustainability.

[37]  Nobuyoshi Yamaguchi,et al.  Analytic hierarchy based policy design method (AHPo) for solving societal problems that require a multifaceted approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  D. D’Agostino Moisture dynamics in an historical masonry structure: The Cathedral of Lecce (South Italy) , 2013 .

[39]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  State of the art in thermal insulation materials and aims for future developments , 2005 .

[40]  Atse Louwen,et al.  Re-assessment of net energy production and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40 years of photovoltaics development , 2016, Nature Communications.

[41]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[42]  Delia D’Agostino,et al.  Energy consumption and efficiency technology measures in European non-residential buildings , 2017 .

[43]  Paolo Maria Congedo,et al.  Cost-optimal design for nearly zero energy office buildings located in warm climates , 2015 .

[44]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[45]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification , 2015 .

[46]  Muhammad Aslam Uqaili,et al.  Simulation tools application for artificial lighting in buildings , 2018 .

[47]  P. Melià Multi‐criteria Decision‐Making for Marine Protected Area Design and Management , 2017 .

[48]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators , 2007 .

[49]  Delia D’Agostino,et al.  Criteria and structure of a harmonised data collection for NZEBs retrofit buildings in Europe , 2017 .

[50]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[51]  Xiaocun Zhang,et al.  Analysis of embodied carbon in the building life cycle considering the temporal perspectives of emissions: A case study in China , 2017 .

[52]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Environmental impacts of natural and conventional building materials: a case study on earth plasters , 2014 .

[53]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review , 2016 .

[54]  Dorota Chwieduk,et al.  Towards modern options of energy conservation in buildings , 2017 .

[55]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Luca Castellazzi,et al.  Towards Nearly Zero Energy Buildings in Europe: A Focus on Retrofit in Non-Residential Buildings , 2017 .

[57]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[58]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[59]  Alberto Moro,et al.  Electricity carbon intensity in European Member States: Impacts on GHG emissions of electric vehicles , 2017, Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment.

[60]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Weighting methodologies in multi‐criteria evaluations of combined heat and power systems , 2009 .

[61]  Craig Langston,et al.  Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: an analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies , 2008 .

[62]  L. Mazzarella,et al.  Data on energy consumption and Nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs) in Europe , 2018, Data in brief.

[63]  Rouzbeh Shad,et al.  Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: Case study in Mashhad city , 2017 .

[64]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: the role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks , 2017 .

[65]  Giuseppe Lembo,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making for fisheries management: A case study of Mediterranean demersal fisheries , 2015 .

[66]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Establishing and weighting decision criteria for building system selection in housing construction , 2012 .

[67]  Popi Konidari,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments , 2007 .

[68]  R. Costanza,et al.  Embodied energy and economic valuation. , 1980, Science.

[69]  D. Parker,et al.  Data on cost-optimal Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) across Europe , 2018, Data in brief.

[70]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[71]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making , 2005 .

[72]  Rahman Azari,et al.  Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[73]  César Martín-Gómez,et al.  Investigation of the thermoelectric potential for heating, cooling and ventilation in buildings: Characterization options and applications , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[75]  P. Bertoldi,et al.  Data on European non-residential buildings , 2017, Data in brief.

[76]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[77]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  The relationship between operational energy demand and embodied energy in Dutch residential buildings , 2018 .

[78]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[79]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  An early history of multiple criteria decision making , 2016 .

[80]  M. Garetti,et al.  A tool to estimate materials and manufacturing energy for a product , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[81]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  The significance of embodied energy in certified passive houses , 2013 .

[82]  Barbara J. Lence,et al.  Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies: a framework and its application , 2007 .

[83]  Monica Lavagna,et al.  Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings , 2018, Building and Environment.

[84]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation , 1980 .

[85]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Enhanced Sequential Search Methodology for Identifying Cost-Optimal Building Pathways , 2008 .

[86]  S. Corgnati,et al.  Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: the experience of TABULA Project , 2014 .

[87]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[88]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[89]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[90]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Net-zero buildings: incorporating embodied impacts , 2015 .