Short-duration transient visual evoked potential for objective measurement of refractive errors

This study examined effects of uncorrected refractive errors (RE) in a short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD t-VEP) system and investigated their role for objective measurement of RE. Refractive errors were induced by means of trial lenses in 35 emmetropic subjects. A synchronized single-channel EEG was recorded for emmetropia, and each simulated refractive state to generate 21 VEP responses for each subject. P100 amplitude (N75 trough to P100 peak) and latency were identified by an automated post-signal processing algorithm. Induced hypermetropia and myopia correlated strongly with both P100 amplitude and latency. To minimize the effect of baseline shift and waveform fluctuations, a VEP scoring system, based on software-derived P100 latency, amplitude and waveform quality, was used to estimate the RE. Using the VEP scores, a single VEP response had a high sensitivity and specificity for discerning emmetropia, small RE (<2 diopter) within a 2 diopter range and large RE (2–14 diopter) within a 4 diopter range. The VEP scoring system has a potential for objective screening of RE and for a more accurate 3-step objective refraction.

[1]  M Millodot,et al.  Refraction determined electrophysiologically. Responses to alternation of visual contours. , 1970, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visually evoked cortical potentials. , 1968, Vision research.

[3]  D W Collins,et al.  Effect of refractive error on the visual evoked response. , 1979, British medical journal.

[4]  D Regan,et al.  Rapid objective refraction using evoked brain potentials. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[5]  J C Armington,et al.  The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. , 1968, Vision research.

[6]  S Tobimatsu,et al.  Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  E Marg,et al.  A reconsideration of visual evoked potentials for fast automated ophthalmic refractions. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[9]  N. A. Shaw,et al.  Age-dependent changes in the amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D Regan,et al.  Brightness contrast and evoked potentials. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  Jeffrey M. Liebmann,et al.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects , 2010, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[12]  R. Spehlmann.  The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Anne Moskowitz,et al.  Effect of retinal blur on the peak latency of the pattern evoked potential , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  Ido Perlman,et al.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[15]  W. Rietveld,et al.  Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes. , 1967, Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Neerlandica.

[16]  James G. May,et al.  Effects of meridional variation on steady-state visual evoked potentials , 1979, Vision Research.