Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach.

The Indian electronics industry is facing immense pressure to include sustainability practices in order to meet customer expectations, comply with legislation and create an edge over competitors. This growing need for inclusion of sustainability is driving original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to collaborate with third-party reverse logistics providers (3PRLPs) to sustainably manage returns. Collaboration with 3PRLP will put OEMs in a stronger position regarding compliance with government legislation, improving upon their corporate image and customer satisfaction. It is a win-win situation for the OEM. On the other hand, from the 3PRLP's point of view, it is important to know the capabilities of the OEMs before entering into a collaborative endeavour. Hence, it is firstly necessary to identify the most appropriate attributes of the manufacturer which are essential for a sustainable collaboration. In this context, the study proposes a novel framework for investigating the performance attributes of the OEMs from the economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainability. Since the evaluation of each attribute for each dimension of sustainability differs in terms of the nature of the information needed and the time and resources required, it is necessary to conduct a pre-evaluation of the attributes using the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method. Furthermore, the shortlisted attributes for each sustainability dimension are evaluated and prioritized using the best worst method (BWM). The novelty of the attribute selection process lies in simultaneously considering the degree of importance of the attribute as well as the degree of difficulty of the collection of data required for the assessment of the OEM. The result of this study helps decision-makers and practitioners to comprehend the most influential attributes of OEMs which are crucial for collaboration, thus enhancing the overall sustainability impact of the supply chain. The managerial implications drawn from the resulting analysis provide the 3PRLP with a sustainable evaluation framework which can be ideally used for the selection of collaborative partners. The above model is validated using the case of an Indian 3PRLP company that handles electronic products.

[1]  V. Mani,et al.  Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India , 2014 .

[2]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry , 2016 .

[3]  Susanne Durst,et al.  Knowledge management in environmental sustainability practices of third-party logistics service providers , 2015 .

[4]  Ramesh Anbanandam,et al.  A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Jyoti Dhingra Darbari,et al.  An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers , 2017, Annals of Operations Research.

[6]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies , 2010 .

[7]  R. K. Mittal,et al.  An investigation into e-waste flows in India , 2012 .

[8]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices , 2015 .

[9]  P. Murugesan,et al.  Multicriteria group decision making for the third party reverse logistics service provider in the supply chain model using fuzzy TOPSIS for transportation services , 2009, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Wei-Kai Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Chong Wu,et al.  Partner selection for reverse logistics centres in green supply chains: a fuzzy artificial immune optimisation approach , 2016 .

[12]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers using quality function deployment and Taguchi loss function , 2015 .

[13]  S. Zailani,et al.  Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes , 2011 .

[14]  Zaili Yang,et al.  Modeling selection of third party ship management services , 2014 .

[15]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods , 2011 .

[16]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[17]  Pravin Kumar,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain , 2012 .

[18]  J. D. Darbari,et al.  A multi-objective fuzzy mathematical approach for sustainable reverse supply chain configuration , 2017 .

[19]  Rajesh K. Singh,et al.  Analyzing disposition strategies in reverse supply chains: fuzzy TOPSIS approach , 2018 .

[20]  Tasbirul Islam,et al.  Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[21]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  S. Perotti,et al.  Building environmental sustainability: empirical evidence from Logistics Service Providers , 2013 .

[23]  Lauro Osiro,et al.  A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development , 2014 .

[24]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[26]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[27]  Martin Spring,et al.  Third party logistics : a literature review and research agenda , 2007 .

[28]  E. Aktas,et al.  The use of outsourcing logistics activities: The case of turkey , 2011 .

[29]  Govindan Kannan,et al.  Issues in reverse supply chains, part II: reverse distribution issues – an overview , 2008 .

[30]  Aicha Aguezzoul,et al.  Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods , 2014 .

[31]  Govindan Kannan,et al.  Issues in reverse supply chain, part III: classification and simple analysis , 2009 .

[32]  Amin Vafadarnikjoo,et al.  A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[33]  Hokey Min,et al.  THE DYNAMIC DESIGN OF A REVERSE LOGISTICS NETWORK FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS , 2008 .

[34]  Chieh-Yu Lin,et al.  Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China , 2011 .

[35]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  SELECTION OF THE EFFECTIVE DWELLING HOUSE WALLS BY APPLYING ATTRIBUTES VALUES DETERMINED AT INTERVALS , 2008 .

[36]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers , 2010 .

[37]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Waste Management: A Reverse Supply Chain Perspective , 2016 .

[38]  Amydee M. Fawcett,et al.  PEEKING INSIDE THE BLACK BOX: TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION DYNAMICS , 2012 .

[39]  S. José,et al.  Methodology for Performance Evaluation of Reverse Supply Chain , 2011 .

[40]  G. Kannan,et al.  Fuzzy approach for the selection of third party reverse logistics provider , 2009 .

[41]  Hadi Badri Ahmadi,et al.  Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry , 2017 .

[42]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[43]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[44]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review , 2015 .

[45]  Giannis T. Tsoulfas,et al.  A model for supply chains environmental performance analysis and decision making , 2008 .

[46]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2017 .

[47]  Chih-Hung Wu,et al.  Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Enabling sustainable energy futures: factors influencing green supply chain collaboration , 2017 .

[49]  Tugba Efendigil,et al.  A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[50]  A. Sharma,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration for Regional Sustainability , 2011 .

[51]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior,et al.  A multicriteria approach based on fuzzy QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[52]  Chandra Prakash Garg,et al.  An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains , 2017 .

[53]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  An analytic network process-based multicriteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain , 2013 .

[54]  Harlina Suzana Jaafar,et al.  MEASURING CUSTOMERS' PERCEPTIONS OF LOGISTICS SERVICE QUALITY OF 3PL SERVICE PROVIDERS , 2007 .

[55]  M. Cao,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance , 2011 .

[56]  Miao Li,et al.  The removal of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole by a high infiltration rate artificial composite soil treatment system , 2017, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

[57]  Minna Halme,et al.  The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for innovative services? , 2010 .

[58]  Devika Kannan,et al.  Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process , 2018 .

[59]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management , 2016 .

[60]  Saeed Mansour,et al.  To develop a third-party reverse logistics network for end-of-life vehicles in Iran , 2013 .

[61]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment , 2016 .

[62]  K. Smallbone,et al.  An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method , 2013 .

[63]  Anita Kumar Extended TPB model to understand consumer “selling” behaviour: Implications for reverse supply chain design of mobile phones , 2017 .

[64]  Jim Browne,et al.  Towards a taxonomy of resource recovery from end-of-life products , 2000 .

[65]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain , 2008 .

[66]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  J. Thakkar,et al.  Sustainable supply chain practices: an empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry , 2016 .

[68]  S. Seuring,et al.  Putting sustainability into supply chain management , 2014 .

[69]  Jyoti Dhingra Darbari,et al.  A Fuzzy Optimization Approach for Designing a Sustainable RL Network in a Strategic Alliance Between OEM and 3PRL , 2015, SocProS.

[70]  Mariano Corso,et al.  The role of knowledge management in supply chains: evidence from the Italian food industry , 2010, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[71]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Developing environmentally sustainable logistics. Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers' perspective , 2016 .

[73]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and SWOT Method for Outsourcing Reverse Logistics Highlights , 2015 .

[74]  A. Noorul Haq,et al.  Analysing Interactions among Battery Recycling Barriers in the Reverse Supply Chain , 2010 .

[75]  Maghsoud Amiri,et al.  Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[76]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2015 .

[77]  R. Singh,et al.  Reverse supply chain issues in Indian electronics industry: a case study , 2018, Journal of Remanufacturing.

[78]  David J. Barnes,et al.  Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: A Dempster-Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach , 2010 .

[79]  B. Çatay,et al.  Third‐party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company , 2007 .

[80]  S. Garg,et al.  Selection and Peer-review under Responsibility of the Organizing Committee of Gcmm 2014 Sciencedirect Topsis-ahp Based Approach for Selection of Reverse Logistics Service Provider: a Case Study of Mobile Phone Industry , 2022 .

[81]  P. Sasikumar,et al.  Issues in reverse supply chains, part I: end‐of‐life product recovery and inventory management – an overview , 2008 .

[82]  Md. Abdul Moktadir,et al.  Barriers to Reverse Logistics in the Computer Supply Chain Using Interpretive Structural Model , 2018 .

[83]  V. S. Gadakh,et al.  Application of complex proportional assessment method for vendor selection , 2014 .

[84]  J. Rezaei,et al.  A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method , 2016 .

[85]  Chandra Prakash Garg,et al.  Sustainable outsourcing partner selection and evaluation using an integrated BWM–VIKOR framework , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[86]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision , 2008 .