Shifting conceptions of complexity in forest management and silviculture

Abstract In the past several decades, a trend in forestry and silviculture has been toward promoting complexity in forest ecosystems, but how complexity is conceived and described has shifted over time as new ideas and terminology have been introduced. Historically, ecologically-focused silviculture has focused largely on manipulation of structural complexity, but often with the functional role of features in mind. Recently there has been a shift toward viewing complexity in an “adaptive” or “resilience” context, with a focus on understanding forests as complex adaptive systems. As new concepts and terminology are introduced it will be essential that silviculture researchers understand their dissemination into silviculture research, experimental design, and treatment implementation. With this goal in mind we set out to better understand: (1) how complexity terminology and ideas have shifted over time in silviculture, (2) how different conceptions of complexity have been incorporated into silviculture experiments and treatments, and (3) how various complexity concepts are being reconciled with each other in practice. We conducted a multi-stage review of the silvicultural literature for the time period 1992–2017 that included: (1) a broad keyword analysis, (2) a detailed review of a narrower subset of publications, and (3) a thorough review of a set of silvicultural experiments that included a focus on complexity in their design. We also developed a set of case studies that illustrate shifts in complexity conceptions in silvicultural experiment design and analysis. Our analysis indicates considerable lags in incorporation of complexity-focused terminology and ideas into silvicultural research and experimental treatment design. Very few silviculture-focused studies have incorporated adaptive complexity concepts explicitly into design or analysis, even though these concepts were introduced nearly a decade ago and are widely discussed in the literature. However, in our case studies we document how silviculture experiments and research programs that were not designed explicitly around complexity concepts have begun to incorporate these ideas into analysis of treatment outcomes. Silviculture researchers should focus on reconciling conceptions of complexity through analysis of existing experiments and with modeling studies, as well as attempting to better understand mechanistic relationships among structural, functional, and adaptive conceptions of complexity.

[1]  B. Palik,et al.  An Ecological Context for Regenerating Mult-cohort, Mixed-species Red Pine Forests , 2003 .

[2]  P. Mote,et al.  Future climate in the Pacific Northwest , 2010 .

[3]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  A Critique of Silviculture: Managing for Complexity , 2008 .

[4]  David R. Carter,et al.  Reserve tree mortality in two expanding-gap silvicultural systems 20 years after establishment in the Acadian forest of Maine, USA , 2017 .

[5]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  The roles of environmental filtering and colonization in the fine‐scale spatial patterning of ground‐layer plant communities in north temperate deciduous forests , 2011 .

[6]  A. Ares,et al.  Understory vegetation response to thinning disturbance of varying complexity in coniferous stands , 2009 .

[7]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass growth response to spatial pattern of variable‐retention harvesting in a northern Minnesota pine ecosystem. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  A. Larson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF A HETEROGENEOUS MIXED-CONIFER CANOPY ON SNOW ACCUMULATION AND MELT , 2016 .

[9]  Robert M. Zink,et al.  Bird species diversity , 1996, Nature.

[10]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Reference conditions are influenced by the physical template and vary by forest type: A synthesis of Pinus ponderosa-dominated sites in the southwestern United States , 2017 .

[11]  S. Macdonald,et al.  Ecosystem memory of wildfires affects resilience of boreal mixedwood biodiversity after retention harvest. , 2017 .

[12]  W. Keeton,et al.  Enhanced carbon storage through management for old‐growth characteristics in northern hardwood‐conifer forests , 2017 .

[13]  W. Keeton,et al.  Emulating Natural Disturbance Regimes: an Emerging Approach for Sustainable Forest Management , 2008 .

[14]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Forest resilience and tipping points at different spatio‐temporal scales: approaches and challenges , 2015 .

[15]  A. Ares,et al.  Understory abundance, species diversity and functional attribute response to thinning in coniferous stands , 2010 .

[16]  A. B. Carey.  Experimental manipulation of spatial heterogeneity in Douglas-fir forests : effects on squirrels , 2001 .

[17]  W. Keeton,et al.  Structural Complexity Enhancement increases fungal species richness in northern hardwood forests , 2015 .

[18]  T. Spies,et al.  Fire-mediated pathways of stand development in Douglas-fir/ western hemlock forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. , 2013, Ecology.

[19]  J. Franklin,et al.  The Northwest Forest Plan: Origins, Components, Implementation Experience, and Suggestions for Change , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  P. Anderson,et al.  Large-scale silviculture experiments of western Oregon and Washington , 2007 .

[21]  P. Reich,et al.  Harvest-created canopy gaps increase species and functional trait diversity of the forest ground-layer community , 2014 .

[22]  A. Larson,et al.  Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments , 2012 .

[23]  W. Keeton,et al.  DO REMNANT OLD‐GROWTH TREES ACCELERATE RATES OF SUCCESSION IN MATURE DOUGLAS‐FIR FORESTS? , 2005 .

[24]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Overstory Response to Alternative Thinning Treatments in Young Douglas-fir Forests of Western Oregon , 2007 .

[25]  C. Peterson,et al.  Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. Proceedings of a conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 15-20 August 2004. , 2005 .

[26]  Christina L. Staudhammer,et al.  Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity , 2001 .

[27]  Christian Ammer,et al.  Quantifying stand structural complexity and its relationship with forest management, tree species diversity and microclimate , 2017 .

[28]  Philip J. Burton,et al.  A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives , 1997 .

[29]  Arne Pommerening,et al.  Approaches to quantifying forest structures , 2002 .

[30]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Intraspecific variability and reaction norms of forest understorey plant species traits , 2017 .

[31]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Ground‐layer disturbance and initial conditions influence gap partitioning of understorey vegetation , 2007 .

[32]  P. Reich,et al.  Canopy gap size influences niche partitioning of the ground-layer plant community in a northern temperate forest , 2013 .

[33]  W. Keeton.  Managing for late-successional/old-growth characteristics in northern hardwood-conifer forests , 2006 .

[34]  Patricia Raymond,et al.  Regeneration dynamics after patch cutting and scarification in yellow birch – conifer stands , 2010 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[36]  W. Keeton,et al.  Changing forests—changing streams: riparian forest stand development and ecosystem function in temperate headwaters , 2016 .

[37]  S. A. Jeronimo,et al.  Historical forest structure, composition, and spatial pattern in dry conifer forests of the western Blue Mountains, Oregon , 2017 .

[38]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Managing for adaptive capacity : thinning improves food availability for wildlife and insect pollinators under climate change conditions , 2013 .

[39]  A. Ares,et al.  Early responses to thinning treatments designed to accelerate late successional forest structure in young coniferous stands of western Oregon, USA , 2012 .

[40]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences , 2016 .

[41]  A. D’Amato,et al.  Diversifying the composition and structure of managed late-successional forests with harvest gaps: What is the optimal gap size? , 2013 .

[42]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Experimentally linking disturbance, resources and productivity to diversity in forest ground‐layer plant communities , 2014 .

[43]  Experimental Manipulation of Forest Structure: Near-Term Effects on Gap and Stand Scale C Dynamics , 2013, Ecosystems.

[44]  J. Hiers,et al.  Modeling silviculture after natural disturbance to sustain biodiversity in the longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem: balancing complexity and implementation , 2002 .

[45]  L. Nagel,et al.  Factors influencing tree species diversity and Betula alleghaniensis establishment in silvicultural openings , 2007 .

[46]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Coarse Woody Debris in Douglas-Fir Forests of Western Oregon and Washington , 1988 .

[47]  R. Swihart,et al.  The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management , 2013 .

[48]  E. Knapp,et al.  Quantifying spatial patterns of tree groups and gaps in mixed-conifer forests: Reference conditions and long-term changes following fire suppression and logging , 2013 .

[49]  C. Webster,et al.  Ground-layer response to group selection with legacy-tree retention in a managed northern hardwood forest , 2007 .

[50]  L. W. Krefting,et al.  Factors Important to Yellow Birch Establishment in Upper Michigan , 1960 .

[51]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[52]  R. Kasten Dumroese,et al.  Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function , 2014 .

[53]  I. Drobyshev,et al.  Pre- and post-European settlement fire history of red pine dominated forest ecosystems of Seney National Wildlife Refuge, Upper Michigan , 2008 .

[54]  Ronald E. Thill,et al.  Long-Term Research at the USDA Forest Service's Experimental Forests and Ranges , 2006 .

[55]  Christian Messier,et al.  Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience , 2006 .

[56]  Thomas R. Crow,et al.  Structural Characteristics of Old‐Growth Hemlock‐Hardwood Forests in Relation to Age , 1994 .

[57]  J. Franklin,et al.  Natural Disturbance and Stand Development Principles for Ecological Forestry , 2015 .

[58]  Stephen D. Pecot,et al.  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF OVERSTORY RETENTION INFLUENCES RESOURCES AND GROWTH OF LONGLEAF PINE SEEDLINGS , 2003 .

[59]  C. Messier,et al.  Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems , 2013 .

[60]  Keith B. Aubry,et al.  Ecological effects of variable-retention harvests in the north- western United States: the DEMO study * , 2004 .

[61]  J. Tappeiner,et al.  Density, ages, and growth rates in old-growth and young-growth forests in coastal Oregon , 1997 .

[62]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Management trade-off between aboveground carbon storage and understory plant species richness in temperate forests. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[63]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Accelerating the development of old-growth characteristics in second-growth northern hardwoods , 2015 .

[64]  Y. Serengil,et al.  Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: building resilience to the challenge of global change , 2014 .

[65]  R. Fahey,et al.  Quantifying canopy complexity and effects on productivity and resilience in late-successional hemlock-hardwood forests. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[66]  David D. Marshall,et al.  Silvicultural options for young-growth Douglas-fir forests: the Capitol Forest study—establishment and first results. , 2004 .

[67]  David L. R. Affleck,et al.  Early forest thinning changes aboveground carbon distribution among pools, but not total amount , 2017 .

[68]  Paul D. Anderson,et al.  BLM Density Management and Riparian Buffer Study: Establishment Report and Study Plan , 2006 .

[69]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Managing for adaptive capacity: thinning improves food availability for wildlife and insect pollinators under climate change conditions , 2013 .

[70]  P. Reich,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[71]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Viewing forests through the lens of complex systems science , 2014 .

[72]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Scaling environmental change through the community‐level: a trait‐based response‐and‐effect framework for plants , 2008 .

[73]  Justin E. Arseneault,et al.  First decadal response to treatment in a disturbance-based silviculture experiment in Maine , 2011 .

[74]  David E. Hibbs,et al.  A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. , 2000 .

[75]  S. Fraver,et al.  Forest management for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: Insights from long-term silviculture experiments , 2011 .

[76]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Overstory Composition and Stand Structure Influence Herbaceous Plant Diversity in the Mixed Aspen Forest of Northern Minnesota , 2000 .

[77]  Andrew B. Carey,et al.  Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-Fir forests , 1991 .

[78]  M. Janowiak,et al.  Stand structure and composition in a Northern Hardwood forest after 40 years of single-tree selection , 2007 .

[79]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The canopy surface and stand development: assessing forest canopy structure and complexity with near-surface altimetry , 2004 .

[80]  P. Grubb.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE , 1977 .

[81]  Robert S. Seymour,et al.  Natural disturbance regimes in northeastern North America—evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequencies , 2002 .

[82]  R. Waring,et al.  Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1979, Science.

[83]  J. Franklin,et al.  Multiple successional pathways and precocity in forest development: can some forests be born complex? , 2012 .

[84]  S. Stephens,et al.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[85]  T. Bal,et al.  Evidence of damage from exotic invasive earthworm activity was highly correlated to sugar maple dieback in the Upper Great Lakes region , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[86]  D. F. Berg,et al.  Alternative silviclutural approaches to timber harvesting : variable retention harvest systems , 1997 .

[87]  A. Larson,et al.  Historical spatial patterns and contemporary tree mortality in dry mixed-conifer forests , 2016 .

[88]  T. Schuler.  Fifty years of partial harvesting in a mixed mesophytic forest: composition and productivity , 2004 .

[89]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Foliage Profile by Vertical Measurements , 1969 .

[90]  G. Bohrer,et al.  The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest. , 2011, Ecology.

[91]  J. Schütz.  Close-to-nature silviculture: is this concept compatible with species diversity? , 1999 .

[92]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[93]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change: A National Experiment in Manager-Scientist Partnerships to Apply an Adaptation Framework , 2017 .

[94]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity , 1989 .

[95]  T. Crow,et al.  Effects of Management on the Composition and Structure of Northern Hardwood Forests in Upper Michigan , 2002 .

[96]  Margaret W. Roberts,et al.  Long‐term impacts of variable retention harvesting on ground‐layer plant communities in Pinus resinosa forests , 2016 .

[97]  Lee E. Frelich,et al.  Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen-Deciduous Forests , 2002 .

[98]  Aaron J. Poznanovic,et al.  Spatial patterning of underrepresented tree species in canopy gaps 9years after group selection cutting , 2014 .

[99]  D. Tietze.  Bird Species , 2018, Fascinating Life Sciences.

[100]  Peter H. Singleton,et al.  Restoring fire-prone Inland Pacific landscapes: seven core principles , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[101]  Jarrett J. Barber,et al.  Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[102]  Brian J. Harvey,et al.  Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience , 2016 .

[103]  A. Prasad,et al.  Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios , 2008 .

[104]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Restoring forest resilience: From reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring , 2013 .

[105]  Matthew A. Williamson,et al.  Making Monitoring Count: Project Design for Active Adaptive Management , 2013 .

[106]  S. Acker,et al.  Development of old-growth structure and timber volume growth trends in maturing Douglas-fir stands , 1998 .

[107]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  The Structure of Natural Young , Mature , and Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests in Oregon and Washington , 2010 .

[108]  J. Franklin,et al.  The ICO Approach to Quantifying and Restoring Forest Spatial Pattern: Implementation Guide , 2016 .

[109]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Forest Restoration Using Variable Density Thinning: Lessons from Douglas-Fir Stands in Western Oregon , 2016 .

[110]  J. L. Willis,et al.  Challenges facing gap-based silviculture and possible solutions for mesic northern forests in North America , 2017 .

[111]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Managing Stand Structure as Part of Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management in Australian Mountain Ash Forests , 1997 .

[112]  K. Puettmann,et al.  The intertwining paths of the density managment and riparian buffer study and the Northwest Forest Plan , 2013 .

[113]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Multiscale Controls on Natural Regeneration Dynamics after Partial Overstory Removal in Douglas-Fir Forests in Western Oregon, USA , 2014 .

[114]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses , 2015 .

[115]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Partial Cuttings in Northern Hardwoods of the Lake States: Twenty-Year Experimental Results , 1953 .

[116]  Phillip B. Gibbons,et al.  Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement , 2005 .

[117]  K. Puettmann.  Silvicultural Challenges and Options in the Context of Global Change: “Simple” Fixes and Opportunities for New Management Approaches , 2011 .