K-nearest neighbor driving active contours to delineate biological tumor volumes

Abstract An algorithm for tumor delineation in positron emission tomography (PET) is presented. Segmentation is achieved by a local active contour algorithm, integrated and optimized with the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification method, which takes advantage of the stratified k-fold cross-validation strategy. The proposed approach is evaluated considering the delineation of cancers located in different body districts (i.e. brain, head and neck, and lung), and considering different PET radioactive tracers. Data are pre-processed in order to be expressed in terms of standardized uptake value, the most widely used PET quantification index. The algorithm uses an initial, operator selected region containing the lesion, and automatically identifies an operator-independent optimal region of interest around the tumor. Successively, a slice-by-slice marching local active contour segmentation algorithm is used. The key novelty of the proposed approach consists of a novel form of the energy to be minimized during segmentation, which is enhanced by incorporating the information provided by a KNN classifier. The delineation process and its termination are fully automatic, so that intervention from the user is reduced to a minimum. Due to the high level of automation, the final segmented lesion is independent of inter-operator variation in the initial user input, making the entire process robust and the result completely repeatable. In order to assess the performance under different contrast ratio scenarios, we first evaluate the proposed method on five phantom datasets. Next, we assess the applicability of the method in the radiotherapy environment by investigating fifty clinical cases and two different PET radio-tracers. Our investigation shows that the proposed method can be applied in clinical settings and produces accurate and operator-independent segmentations, attaining good accuracy in realistic conditions.

[1]  Tadashi Nariai,et al.  Usefulness of L-[methyl-11C] methionine-positron emission tomography as a biological monitoring tool in the treatment of glioma. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  Shih-Neng Yang,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT-based gross tumor volume definition for radiotherapy in head and neck Cancer: a correlation study between suitable uptake value threshold and tumor parameters , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[3]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Generic and robust method for automatic segmentation of PET images using an active contour model. , 2016, Medical physics.

[4]  Mike Partridge,et al.  Evaluation of the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy target definition in patients with head and neck cancer , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[5]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Wei Lu,et al.  Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in 18F-FDG PET , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Accurate automatic delineation of heterogeneous functional volumes in positron emission tomography for oncology applications. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Miguel Pagola,et al.  Twelve automated thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images: a phantom study. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  H Zaidi,et al.  Contourlet-based active contour model for PET image segmentation. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  Anthony J. Yezzi,et al.  A smart and operator independent system to delineate tumours in Positron Emission Tomography scans , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[13]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Huan Yu,et al.  Coregistered FDG PET/CT-Based Textural Characterization of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future? , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  M C Gilardi,et al.  Metabolic impact of partial volume correction of [18F]FDG PET-CT oncological studies on the assessment of tumor response to treatment. , 2014, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[17]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Effects of cold sphere walls in PET phantom measurements on the volume reproducing threshold , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  A. Yezzi,et al.  A variational framework for joint segmentation and registration , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[20]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET. , 2010, Medical physics.

[21]  Daniel A Low,et al.  A novel PET tumor delineation method based on adaptive region-growing and dual-front active contours. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Gradient-based delineation of the primary GTV on FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with threshold-based approaches, CT and surgical specimens. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Evaluation of PET volume segmentation methods: comparisons with expert manual delineations , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[24]  Oleg S. Pianykh,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[25]  Su Ruan,et al.  Segmentation of heterogeneous or small FDG PET positive tissue based on a 3D-locally adaptive random walk algorithm , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[26]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Automated thresholded region classification using a robust feature selection method for PET-CT , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[27]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  Robust segmentation and accurate target definition for positron emission tomography images using Affinity Propagation , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[28]  D. Bluemke,et al.  A framework to measure myocardial extracellular volume fraction using dual-phase low dose CT images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[29]  Roberto Pirrone,et al.  A fully automatic method for biological target volume segmentation of brain metastases , 2016, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[30]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy. , 2010, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[31]  Edoardo Ardizzone,et al.  An enhanced random walk algorithm for delineation of head and neck cancers in PET studies , 2017, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[32]  Anthony Yezzi,et al.  Hybrid geodesic region-based curve evolutions for image segmentation , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  John L. Humm,et al.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[34]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[35]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Eva Bezak,et al.  Current challenges in clinical target volume definition: Tumour margins and microscopic extensions , 2012, Acta oncologica.

[37]  Yan Qiu Chen,et al.  Improving nearest neighbor classification with cam weighted distance , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[38]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool , 2015, BMC Medical Imaging.

[39]  Emmanuel Roux,et al.  Linking clinical measurements and kinematic gait patterns of toe-walking using fuzzy decision trees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[40]  Claus Belka,et al.  Automated biological target volume delineation for radiotherapy treatment planning using FDG-PET/CT , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[41]  Wei Lu,et al.  Toward a standard for the evaluation of PET‐Auto‐Segmentation methods following the recommendations of AAPM task group No. 211: Requirements and implementation , 2017, Medical physics.

[42]  Giorgio Ivan Russo,et al.  Normal and Abnormal Tissue Classification in Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Studies , 2018 .

[43]  B. Erickson,et al.  Machine Learning for Medical Imaging. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[44]  M. Miften,et al.  A region growing method for tumor volume segmentation on PET images for rectal and anal cancer patients. , 2009, Medical physics.

[45]  Massimo Ippolito,et al.  Use of PET/CT to detect local and regional laryngeal cancer recurrence after surgery , 2017 .

[46]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[47]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  Salvatore Vitabile,et al.  Metabolic response assessment in non-small cell lung cancer patients after platinum-based therapy: A preliminary analysis , 2015 .

[49]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[50]  J. Lee,et al.  Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[51]  Xinjian Chen,et al.  Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: Applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[52]  Anthony J. Yezzi,et al.  Active contour algorithm with discriminant analysis for delineating tumors in positron emission tomography , 2019, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[53]  Christian Barillot,et al.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[54]  I. Buvat,et al.  Reliability of SUV estimates in FDG PET as a function of acquisition and processing protocols , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[55]  Philippe Maksud,et al.  Hybrid PET/MRI co-segmentation based on joint fuzzy connectedness and graph cut , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..