An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures.

The murine local lymph node assay is a predictive test for the identification of skin-sensitizing chemicals. The method has been the subject both of national inter-laboratory studies and of extensive comparisons with guinea pig tests. In the investigations reported here, the local lymph node assay has been evaluated further in the context of an international study comprising five independent laboratories. In addition, the influence of minor modifications to the standard assay procedure on the performance of the test has been examined. The modified procedures investigated were exposure of mice for 4 rather than 3 consecutive days, excision of lymph nodes 4 rather than 5 days after the initiation of exposure and the use of an alternative isotope. All five laboratories, irrespective of whether the standard or a modified protocol was used, were able to identify accurately, and with comparable sensitivity, potassium dichromate and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene as skin sensitizers. Using standard criteria, none of the laboratories recorded positive responses with methyl salicylate, a non-sensitizer. In the standard protocol, lymph nodes are pooled for each experimental group and the vigor of responses measured as a stimulation index relative to vehicle controls. A stimulation index of 3 or greater is considered to indicate skin-sensitizing potential. One further modification adopted by three of the laboratories was to analyze nodes from individual animals and, thereby, permit statistical evaluation. This allowed a direct comparison of statistical significance with the conventional stimulation index as criteria for a positive response. The data indicate that, while statistical evaluation may provide, in some instances, for small increases in sensitivity, this may be at the expense of some loss of selectivity. There are, however, insufficient data presently to draw firm conclusions regarding the relative value of statistical analysis. These studies demonstrate that the local lymph node assay is sufficiently robust to accommodate minor procedural and technical modifications without material changes in test performance.

[1]  J. Descotes.  Identification of Contact Allergens: The Mouse Ear Sensitization Assay , 1988 .

[2]  C. Dunnett.  A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[3]  E. Buehler.  A rationale for the selection of occlusion to induce and elicit delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. A prospective test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[4]  M. Bartlett.  Sub‐Sampling for Attributes , 1937 .

[5]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[6]  D. Basketter,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of the Local Lymph Node Assay with 25 Chemicals and Comparison with Guinea Pig Test Data , 1991 .

[7]  H. Maibach,et al.  Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[8]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[9]  I Kimber,et al.  Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitizing potential. , 1991, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  T. Gray,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[11]  I. Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: Results of a final inter‐laboratory validation under field conditions , 1992, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[12]  S C Gad,et al.  The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in the 1990s. , 1994, Toxicology.

[13]  I. Kimber,et al.  Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: Comparisons with the buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs , 1990, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[14]  D A Basketter,et al.  Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  G. Frank Gerberick,et al.  Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. , 1992 .

[16]  P. Thorne,et al.  The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. I. Refinements for detecting weak contact sensitizers. , 1991, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[18]  M. Chase,et al.  Mechanisms of hypersensitivity , 1959 .

[19]  A. Groot,et al.  Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology , 1983 .

[20]  D. Basketter,et al.  Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays. , 1993, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[21]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. , 1994, Toxicology.

[22]  J. Gastwirth.  Non-parametric Statistical Methods , 1990 .

[23]  I. Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  S. Gad,et al.  Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). , 1986, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[25]  J. Tepper,et al.  Evaluation of Several Variations of the Mouse Ear Swelling Test (MEST) for Detection of Weak and Moderate Contact Sensitizers , 1993 .

[26]  A. Kligman.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. I. A critique of standard methods. , 1966, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[27]  Sharon L. Rodenberger,et al.  Murine Model for Contact Sensitization , 1993 .

[28]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[29]  D A Basketter,et al.  An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[30]  J. Montelius,et al.  Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants. , 1994, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[31]  O. J. Dunn.  Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums , 1964 .

[32]  D. Basketter,et al.  The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. , 1994, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.