Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics

This article contributes to ongoing debates about the direction of comparative politics through an analysis of new data on the scope, objectives, and methods of research in the field. The results of the analysis are as follows. Comparative politics is a rich and diverse field that cannot be accurately characterized on the basis of just one dimension or even summarized in simple terms. In turn, the tendency to frame choices about the direction of the field in terms of a stark alternative between an old area studies approach and a new economic approach relies on largely unsupported assumptions. It is therefore advisable to focus on problematic methodological practices that, as this study shows, are widespread in comparative research and thus pose serious impediments to the production of knowledge.

[1]  R. Snyder Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method , 2001 .

[2]  David Collier,et al.  Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology , 2004 .

[3]  Ira Katznelson,et al.  Political science : the state of the discipline , 2002 .

[4]  Gabriel A. Almond,et al.  The Politics of Developing Areas. , 1960 .

[5]  J. Mahoney,et al.  Comparative historical analysis: Achievements and agendas , 2003 .

[6]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics , 2004 .

[7]  D. Laitin Comparative Politics: the State of the Subdiscipline , 2000 .

[8]  T. Skocpol,et al.  “Doubly Engaged Social Science: The Promise of Comparative Historical Analysis” , 2003 .

[9]  N. Hermes,et al.  State, society and development , 1999 .

[10]  Kurt Weyland Limitations of rational-choice institutionalism for the study of Latin American politics , 2002 .

[11]  M. Lichbach,et al.  Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure , 1997 .

[12]  M. Levi The Economic Turn in Comparative Politics , 2000 .

[13]  A. Przeworski,et al.  Quantitative cross-national research methods , 2001 .

[14]  Gerardo L. Munck,et al.  Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics , 2007 .

[15]  B. Geddes Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics , 2003 .

[16]  D. Laitin,et al.  The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science , 2003 .

[17]  Paul Pierson,et al.  Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science , 2002 .

[18]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Rational Choice Theory and Large-Scale Data Analysis , 1998 .

[19]  D. Green,et al.  Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science , 1994 .

[20]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology , 2004 .

[21]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science , 1998, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[22]  Leonard A. Steverson Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .

[23]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[24]  M. Lichbach Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science , 2003 .

[25]  A. P. Hull Comparative Political Science: An Inventory and Assessment since the 1980's , 1999, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[26]  J. E. Hanley Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[27]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[28]  John H. Goldtborpe The Quantitative Analysis of Large-Scale Data-sets and Rational Action Theory: For a Sociological Alliance , 1996 .

[29]  The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics , 2004 .

[30]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[31]  David Collier Data, Field Work, and Extracting New Ideas at Close Range , 1999 .

[32]  G. Sartori Where is Political Science Going? , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[33]  Who Publishes in Comparative Politics? Studying the World from the United States , 2007, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[34]  K. Bollen,et al.  MACROCOMPARATIVE RESEARCH METHODS , 1993 .

[35]  James Mahoney,et al.  Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[36]  G. Almond A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science , 1989 .

[37]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method , 1971, American Political Science Review.

[38]  K. Shepsle Rational Choice Institutionalism , 2008 .

[39]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  Political Science: The Discipline , 1998 .

[40]  A. Stepan Arguing Comparative Politics , 2001 .

[41]  C. Mills The Sociological Imagination , 1959 .

[42]  Michelle L. Dion,et al.  Revolution or Contribution? Rational Choice Approaches in the Study of Latin American Politics , 2002, Latin American Politics and Society.

[43]  Joel Krieger,et al.  The Oxford companion to politics of the world , 1993 .

[44]  T. Skocpol Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: DOUBLY ENGAGED SOCIAL SCIENCE , 2003 .

[45]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[46]  K. Monroe Perestroika! : the raucous rebellion in political science , 2005 .

[47]  Ada W. Finifter,et al.  Political science : the state of the discipline , 1983 .

[48]  B. Geddes How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics , 1990, Political Analysis.

[49]  B. Roberts,et al.  Rethinking development in Latin America , 2005 .