Contrasting the efficiency of radiation belt losses caused by ducted and nonducted whistler-mode waves from ground-based transmitters

It has long been recognized that whistler-mode waves can be trapped in plasmaspheric whistler ducts which guide the waves. For nonguided cases these waves are said to be "nonducted", which is dominant for L < 1.6. Wave-particle interactions are affected by the wave being ducted or nonducted. In the field-aligned ducted case, first-order cyclotron resonance is dominant, whereas nonducted interactions open up a much wider range of energies through equatorial and off-equatorial resonance. There is conflicting information as to whether the most significant particle loss processes are driven by ducted or nonducted waves. In this study we use loss cone observations from the DEMETER and POES low-altitude satellites to focus on electron losses driven by powerful VLF communications transmitters. Both satellites confirm that there are well-defined enhancements in the flux of electrons in the drift loss cone due to ducted transmissions from the powerful transmitter with call sign NWC. Typically, ∼80% of DEMETER nighttime orbits to the east of NWC show electron flux enhancements in the drift loss cone, spanning a L range consistent with first-order cyclotron theory, and inconsistent with nonducted resonances. In contrast, ∼1% or less of nonducted transmissions originate from NPM-generated electron flux enhancements. While the waves originating from these two transmitters have been predicted to lead to similar levels of pitch angle scattering, we find that the enhancements from NPM are at least 50 times smaller than those from NWC. This suggests that lower-latitude, nonducted VLF waves are much less effective in driving radiation belt pitch angle scattering.

[1]  J. Green,et al.  Use of POES SEM-2 observations to examine radiation belt dynamics and energetic electron precipitation into the atmosphere , 2010 .

[2]  U. Inan,et al.  DEMETER observations of transmitter‐induced precipitation of inner radiation belt electrons , 2009 .

[3]  F. Menk,et al.  Remote sensing space weather events: Antarctic‐Arctic Radiation‐belt (Dynamic) Deposition‐VLF Atmospheric Research Konsortium network , 2009 .

[4]  D. Baker,et al.  Relativistic electron loss timescales in the slot region , 2009 .

[5]  N. Hasebe,et al.  Narrow spikes enhanced by electron precipitation under the inner radiation belt , 2009 .

[6]  R. J. Gamble,et al.  Correction to 'Radiation belt electron precipitation by man-made VLF transmissions' , 2008 .

[7]  Umran S. Inan,et al.  Precipitation signatures of ground-based VLF transmitters , 2008 .

[8]  R. J. Gamble,et al.  Radiation belt electron precipitation due to VLF transmitters: Satellite observations , 2008 .

[9]  R. J. Gamble,et al.  Ground-based transmitter signals observed from space: ducted or , 2008 .

[10]  Umran S. Inan,et al.  Subionospheric VLF observations of transmitter‐induced precipitation of inner radiation belt electrons , 2007 .

[11]  F. Leblanc,et al.  ICE, the electric field experiment on DEMETER , 2006 .

[12]  M. Gangloff,et al.  High-energy electron detection onboard DEMETER: The IDP spectrometer, description and first results on the inner belt , 2006 .

[13]  C. Rodger,et al.  Large solar flares and their ionospheric D region enhancements , 2005 .

[14]  U. Inan,et al.  On the occurrence and spatial extent of electron precipitation induced by oblique nonducted whistler waves , 2004 .

[15]  R. Mccormick,et al.  Testing the importance of precipitation loss mechanisms in the inner radiation belt , 2004 .

[16]  M. Clilverd,et al.  Plasmaspheric storm time erosion , 2000 .

[17]  T. Bell,et al.  Poleward‐displaced electron precipitation from lightning‐generated oblique whistlers , 1999 .

[18]  Craig J. Rodger,et al.  Sunrise effects on VLF signals propagating over a long north‐south path , 1999 .

[19]  R. Thorne,et al.  Correction to “Electron scattering loss in the Earth's inner magnetosphere: 1, Dominant physical processes” and “Electron scattering loss in the Earth's inner magnetosphere: 2, Sensitivity to model parameters” by Bob Abel and Richard M. Thorne , 1999 .

[20]  C. Rodger,et al.  Logarithmic decay and Doppler shift of plasma associated with sprites , 1998 .

[21]  Richard M. Thorne,et al.  Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes , 1998 .

[22]  R. Thorne,et al.  Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere: 2. Sensitivity to model parameters , 1998 .

[23]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Some basic concepts of wave‐particle interactions in collisionless plasmas , 1997 .

[24]  R. Horne,et al.  Ground-based evidence of latitude-dependent cyclotron absorption of whistler mode signals originating from VLF transmitters , 1996 .

[25]  D. Datlowe,et al.  Cyclotron resonance precipitation of energetic electrons from the inner magnetosphere , 1990 .

[26]  N. Thomson Experimental observations of very low latitude man-made whistler-mode signals , 1987 .

[27]  I︠a︡. L. Alʹpert The near-earth and interplanetary plasma , 1983 .

[28]  Ya.L. Al'pert 40 years of whistlers , 1980 .

[29]  N. Thomson Whistler‐mode signals: Group delay by crosscorrelation , 1975 .