Androgen-dependent male vocal performance influences female preference in Neotropical singing mice

Vocalizations used in aggressive and mating contexts often convey reliable information about signaller condition when physical or physiological limitations constrain signal expression. In vertebrates, androgens modulate the expression of vocal signals and provide a proximate link between male condition and signal form. In many songbirds, assessment of males is based on production of trills that are constrained by a performance trade-off between how fast notes are repeated and the frequency bandwidth of each note. In this study, we first recorded trills of male Neotropical singing mice (Scotinomys) to examine whether they show a similar performance trade-off, and then manipulated androgen levels to assess their role in modulating vocal performance. Lastly, we broadcast experimentally manipulated trills to females to determine whether they preferred versions resembling those of androgen-treated males. Singing mice showed a vocal performance trade-off similar to that of birds. Males treated with androgens maintained vocal performance, but castrated mice that were administered empty implants produced trills with lower performance. Females approached high-performance trills more rapidly and spent more time near corresponding speakers. Together, our results demonstrate that androgens modulate the production of physically challenging vocalizations, and the resulting signal variation influences female receiver response.

[1]  Erin R. B. Eldermire,et al.  Trill consistency is an age-related assessment signal in banded wrens , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  D. Kelley,et al.  Historical perspective: Hormonal regulation of behaviors in amphibians , 2005, Hormones and Behavior.

[3]  W. Hoese,et al.  Birdsong: motor function and the evolution of communication , 1992 .

[4]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Chapter 11 – Performance limits on birdsong , 2004 .

[5]  Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test , 2004 .

[7]  D. Kelley,et al.  Hormonal Mechanisms in Acoustic Communication , 2003 .

[8]  M. L. Morton,et al.  Seasonal and Age-Related Changes in Plasma Testosterone Levels in Mountain White-Crowned Sparrows , 1990 .

[9]  F. Goller,et al.  Role of syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing brown thrashers. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Baker,et al.  Squirrels: the animal answer guide , 2007 .

[11]  Rui F. Oliveira Social Modulation of Androgens in Vertebrates: Mechanisms and Function , 2004 .

[12]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[13]  J. Wingfield Short-term changes in plasma levels of hormones during establishment and defense of a breeding territory in male song sparrows, Melospiza melodia , 1985, Hormones and Behavior.

[14]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  K. Sewall,et al.  Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality. , 2010, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[16]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Podos Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches , 2001, Nature.

[18]  C. Marler,et al.  Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights , 2005, Hormones and Behavior.

[19]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context , 2009, Biology Letters.

[20]  N. Neave,et al.  The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinusanaria) song , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  M. Wikelski,et al.  Female choice for male motor skills , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. Wingfield Changes in Reproductive Function of Free-Living Birds in Direct Response to Environmental Perturbations , 1988 .

[24]  M. Hall,et al.  Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J. Podos,et al.  Chapter 5 Vocal Performance and Sensorimotor Learning in Songbirds , 2009 .

[26]  M. Ryan,et al.  Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Steven M. Phelps,et al.  Androgens modulate song effort and aggression in Neotropical singing mice , 2011, Hormones and Behavior.

[28]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  A PERFORMANCE CONSTRAINT ON THE EVOLUTION OF TRILLED VOCALIZATIONS IN A SONGBIRD FAMILY (PASSERIFORMES: EMBERIZIDAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  G. Lyons,et al.  Testosterone-induced changes in contractile protein isoforms in the sexually dimorphic temporalis muscle of the guinea pig. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  F. Goller,et al.  Motor Correlates of Vocal Diversity in Songbirds , 1997 .

[31]  M. D. Beebee Variation in Vocal Performance in the Songs of a Wood‐Warbler: Evidence for the Function of Distinct Singing Modes , 2004 .

[32]  D. Reby,et al.  The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research , 2010 .

[33]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake , 1987 .

[34]  D. Schaid,et al.  Androgen Stimulation and Laryngeal Development , 1985, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[35]  M. Stetson Processing of Environmental Information in Vertebrates , 1988, Proceedings in Life Sciences.

[36]  R. Suthers,et al.  Airflow and pressure during canary song: direct evidence for mini-breaths , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  K. Hammerschmidt,et al.  Female mice respond to male ultrasonic ‘songs’ with approach behaviour , 2009, Biology Letters.

[38]  M. Engstrom,et al.  Vocal Stereotypy and Singing Behavior in Baiomyine Mice , 2007 .

[39]  Andrew H. Bass,et al.  Central pattern generators for social vocalization: Androgen-dependent neurophysiological mechanisms , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[40]  D. E. Valentine,et al.  Short- and long-term effects of testosterone on diaphragm in castrated and normal male rats. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[41]  J. Cynx,et al.  Testosterone implants alter the frequency range of zebra finch songs , 2005, Hormones and Behavior.

[42]  M. Enquist,et al.  A strategic taxonomy of biological communication , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  A. MØller,et al.  Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  J. Podos,et al.  Vocal Performance and Sensorimotor Learning in Songbirds , 2009 .

[45]  J. Wingfield,et al.  The "Challenge Hypothesis": Theoretical Implications for Patterns of Testosterone Secretion, Mating Systems, and Breeding Strategies , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[46]  B. Ballentine The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrows, Melospiza georgiana , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  Raymond L. Neubauer,et al.  Super-normal length song preferences of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and a theory of the evolution of bird song , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[48]  W. Fitch,et al.  Unpacking “Honesty”: Vertebrate Vocal Production and the Evolution of Acoustic Signals , 2003 .

[49]  S. Phelps,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SONGS OF NEOTROPICAL SINGING MICE: TESTING THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DRIFT AND LOCAL ADAPTATION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[51]  B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Integrative Neurobiology of Affiliation , 1996 .

[52]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection and mate choice. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  T. Janicke,et al.  Vocal performance reflects individual quality in a nonpasserine , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  Jennifer L. Keating,et al.  Vocal cues to male androgen levels in giant pandas , 2011, Biology Letters.

[55]  W. Hoese,et al.  Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[56]  Joe N. Perry,et al.  A method of estimating the slope of upper bounds of plots of body size and abundance in natural animal assemblages , 1992 .

[57]  A. Bass,et al.  Plasticity in Brain Sexuality Is Revealed by the Rapid Actions of Steroid Hormones , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  R. J. Barfield,et al.  Intracranial androgenic and estrogenic stimulation of male-typical behaviors in house mice (Mus domesticus) , 1992, Hormones and Behavior.

[59]  Maynard J. Smith,et al.  Animal Signals: Models and Terminology , 1995 .

[60]  D. Kelley,et al.  An androgen receptor mRNA isoform associated with hormone-induced cell proliferation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  The Activation of Birdsong by Testosterone , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[62]  B. Truax Acoustic Communication , 1985 .

[63]  D. Crews Psychobiology of reproductive behavior : an evolutionary perspective , 1987 .

[64]  G. Parker,et al.  Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  Jerram L. Brown,et al.  Testosterone and social and reproductive behaviour in Aphelocoma jays , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Brian S. Nelson,et al.  Vocal tract filtering and sound radiation in a songbird , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[67]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[68]  J. H. Long,et al.  Kinematics of birdsong: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[69]  E. P. Animal Behaviour , 1901, Nature.

[70]  F. Dessì-Fulgheri,et al.  Testosterone-induced changes of call structure, midbrain and syrinx anatomy in partridges , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[71]  J. Byers,et al.  Female mate choice based upon male motor performance , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  E. T. Hooper,et al.  Reproduction, Growth and Development in Two Contiguously Allopatric Rodent Species, Genus Scotinomys , 1976 .

[73]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Animal signals : signalling and signal design in animal communication , 2000 .

[74]  C. Botero,et al.  Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  P. Parker,et al.  Physiological Effects on Demography: A Long‐Term Experimental Study of Testosterone’s Effects on Fitness , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[76]  F Goller,et al.  The neuromuscular control of birdsong. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[77]  A. English,et al.  Investigation of sexual dimorphism in the rabbit masseter muscle showing different effects of androgen deprivation in adult and young adult animals. , 2000, Archives of oral biology.

[78]  W. Calder,et al.  Respiration during song in the canary (Serinus canaria). , 1970, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[79]  O. R. Floody The Hormonal Control of Ultrasonic Communication in Rodents , 1981 .