Genuine partnership and equitable research: Working "with" older people for the development of a smart activity monitoring system

Recent UK government policy has highlighted the value of user involvement in service development, particularly concerning assistive technologies and their role in providing care. This article illustrates the case of a person-centred, participatory project involving older people in the design, implementation and development of innovative technological solutions to enable older people to live independently and age-in-place within their homes and communities. The research aims and objectives included: the identification of technological, psychological and social needs of older people; the definition of user requirements to inform an activity monitoring system for use in private homes and residential care settings; and the analysis of the ways in which such systems impact on the everyday lives of older adults in different settings. The innovative aspects of the user-driven, participatory approach illustrated in this paper concern the involvement of older people as co-researchers throughout the research process. This article reports the reflexive accounts which emerged during the project and provides viable and practical pathways to facilitate participatory research in the development of assistive technology for older adults. It provides practical guidelines for future user-driven, participatory research involving older adults in the design, development and implementation of assistive technologies. Our findings show that developing authentic, non-tokenistic research partnerships and including older people’s ideas, motivations and perspectives in the design and development of these types of technology can lead to productive forms of mutual inspiration and technological solutions grounded in the experiences of older people.

[1]  B. Israel,et al.  Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. , 2001, Education for health.

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[3]  Dana Chisnell,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing , 2009 .

[4]  R. Beinecke,et al.  Commentary: Client Involvement in Public Administration Research and Evaluation , 2008 .

[5]  G. Lacey,et al.  User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  B. Dewar.  Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research - a framework for future development and understanding. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[8]  P. Beresford.  User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation? , 2002, Social Policy and Society.

[9]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[10]  J. Oetzel,et al.  Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. , 2012, Health education research.

[11]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Paula Byrne,et al.  Ambient Assisted Living: From Concept to Implementation , 2012 .

[13]  M. Vaarama,et al.  Care-related quality of life in old age , 2009, European journal of ageing.

[14]  G. Grant,et al.  Defining 'people-centredness': making the implicit explicit. , 1998, Health & social care in the community.

[15]  J. Boote,et al.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. , 2002, Health policy.

[16]  C. Farrell.  Patient and Public Involvement in Health : The Evidence for Policy Implementation , 2004 .

[17]  J. Bradley Cousins,et al.  Unpacking the Participatory Process , 2007, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[18]  D. O'Connor,et al.  Participatory Processes: Creating a "Marketplace of Ideas" with Open Space Technology , 2005 .

[19]  Michael J. Salvo,et al.  Ethics of Engagement: User-Centered Design and Rhetorical Methodology , 2001 .

[20]  A. Hochschild.  Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  A. Pratesi.  The Productivity of Care: Contextualizing Care in Situated Interaction and Shedding Light on its Latent Purposes , 2011 .

[22]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Gathering the requirements for a fall monitor using drama and video with older people , 2006 .

[23]  K. Seelman,et al.  Assistive technology policy: a road to independence for individuals with disabilities. , 1993, The Journal of social issues.

[24]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[25]  K. Dunnell.  Ageing and mortality in the UK--national statistician's annual article on the population. , 2008, Population trends.

[26]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[27]  Lynn Young.  A new direction for community services , 2006 .

[28]  R. Lowry.  Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing Notes For Researchers , 2004 .

[29]  C. McKevitt,et al.  Involving older people in health research. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[30]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[31]  H. Kendig,et al.  Involving older people in community‐based research: Developing a guiding framework for researchers and community organisations , 2009, Australasian journal on ageing.

[32]  Jane Seale,et al.  Older people as partners in assistive technology research: The use of focus groups in the design process , 2002 .

[33]  M. Lane.  Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history , 2005 .

[34]  J. Boote,et al.  What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[35]  Andrew Light,et al.  Technology and the good life , 2000 .

[36]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches , 2006 .

[37]  Sally Brearley,et al.  Involving older people in research: methodological issues. , 2005, Health & social care in the community.