Uptake and Scalability of a Peritoneal Dialysis Virtual Care Solution: Qualitative Study

Background Early research in the area of virtual care solutions with peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has focused on evaluating the outcomes and impact of these solutions. There has been less attention focused on understanding the factors influencing the uptake, usability, and scalability of virtual care for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients receiving PD at home. Objective In this context, a study was undertaken to (1) assess and understand the factors influencing the uptake of a virtual care solution and (2) provide recommendations for the scalability of a virtual care solution aimed at enhancing CKD patients’ outcomes and experiences. Methods This study used a qualitative design with semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach. A total of 25 stakeholders—6 patients and 3 caregivers, 6 health care providers, 2 vendors, and 8 health system decision makers—participated in this study. Results The following three primary mechanisms emerged to influence the usability of the virtual care solution: (1) receiving hands-on training and ongoing communication from a supportive team, (2) adapting to meet user needs and embedding them into workflow, and (3) being influenced by patient and caregiver characteristics. Further, two overarching recommendations were developed for considerations around scalability: (1) co-design locally, embed into the daily workflow, and deploy over time and (2) share the benefits and build the case. Conclusions Study findings can be used by key stakeholders in their future efforts to enhance the implementation, uptake, and scalability of virtual care solutions for CKD and managing PD at home.

[1]  Marcello Tonelli,et al.  Impact of Telehealth Interventions on Processes and Quality of Care for Patients With ESRD. , 2018, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[2]  Effectiveness of a Web-Based eHealth Portal for Delivery of Care to Home Dialysis Patients: A Single-Arm Pilot Study , 2018, Canadian journal of kidney health and disease.

[3]  Telehealth and peritoneal dialysis in the US: outcomes in practice , 2018 .

[4]  Douglas E Schaubel,et al.  US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. , 2018, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[5]  James Shaw,et al.  Virtual care policy recommendations for patient-centred primary care: findings of a consensus policy dialogue using a nominal group technique , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  Natasha C. Campling,et al.  A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users? , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[7]  M. Postma,et al.  Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action , 2017, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[8]  Jennifer M. Hensel,et al.  Exploring the utility and scalability of a telehomecare intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis—a study protocol , 2017, BMC Nephrology.

[9]  A. Bello,et al.  Potential applications of telenephrology to enhance global kidney care , 2017, BMJ Global Health.

[10]  K. McGrail,et al.  Virtual Visits and Patient-Centered Care: Results of a Patient Survey and Observational Study , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  P. Chauveau,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of home telemonitoring in chronic kidney disease patients at different stages by a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (eNephro): rationale and study design , 2017, BMC Nephrology.

[12]  K. Ohe,et al.  Testing the Feasibility and Usability of a Novel Smartphone-Based Self-Management Support System for Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[13]  A. Bello,et al.  Patient and provider perspectives on the design and implementation of an electronic consultation system for kidney care delivery in Canada: a focus group study , 2017, BMJ Open.

[14]  Carol Boston-Fleischhauer The Explosion of Virtual Nursing Care. , 2017, The Journal of nursing administration.

[15]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Remote home management for chronic kidney disease: A systematic review , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  Michael Smith,et al.  Telehealth in the Delivery of Home Dialysis Care: Catching up With Technology. , 2017, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[17]  A. Narva,et al.  Managing CKD by Telemedicine: The Zuni Telenephrology Clinic. , 2017, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[18]  Shoshana J Weiner,et al.  Telemedicine to Promote Patient Safety: Use of Phone-Based Interactive Voice-Response System to Reduce Adverse Safety Events in Pre-dialysis CKD. , 2017, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[19]  B. Clothier,et al.  Telehealth by an Interprofessional Team in Patients With CKD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2016, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[20]  Stephanie W. Ong,et al.  Integrating a Smartphone-Based Self-Management System into Usual Care of Advanced CKD. , 2016, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[21]  Amy Reid,et al.  A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa , 2015, Implementation Science.

[22]  Relocation of remote dwellers living with hemodialysis: a time trade-off survey. , 2015, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[23]  E. Brown Peritoneal dialysis: older patients report better quality of life than younger , 2015, Evidence-Based Nursing.

[24]  Christopher T. Chan,et al.  A virtual ward for home hemodialysis patients – a pilot trial , 2015, Canadian journal of kidney health and disease.

[25]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Patients’ and carers’ experiences of interacting with home haemodialysis technology: implications for quality and safety , 2014, BMC Nephrology.

[26]  D. Ahern,et al.  Enhancing patient engagement and blood pressure management for renal transplant recipients via home electronic monitoring and web-enabled collaborative care. , 2014, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[27]  K. Griva,et al.  Age is not a contraindication to home-based dialysis - Quality-of-Life outcomes favour older patients on peritoneal dialysis regimes relative to younger patients. , 2014, Journal of advanced nursing.

[28]  Juan Li,et al.  Effects of Post-Discharge Nurse-Led Telephone Supportive Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[29]  James Barlow,et al.  Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale , 2013, BMC Nephrology.

[30]  E. Gordon,et al.  Telenephrology: a novel approach to improve coordinated and collaborative care for chronic kidney disease. , 2013, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[31]  Clare Liddy,et al.  Building access to specialist care through e-consultation , 2012, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[32]  N. Pannu,et al.  Health care costs of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and dialysis modality switching. , 2013, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[33]  A. Bello,et al.  Impact of remote location on quality care delivery and relationships to adverse health outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[34]  Amit X Garg,et al.  Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. , 2012, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[35]  Cihi Snapshot,et al.  Treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada. , 2012, Healthcare quarterly.

[36]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[37]  H. Sangha,et al.  Peritoneal dialysis first: rationale. , 2011, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[38]  A. Bello,et al.  Quality of care and mortality are worse in chronic kidney disease patients living in remote areas. , 2011, Kidney international.

[39]  E. Kaldoudi,et al.  Home Care Telematics for Peritoneal Dialysis: Field Analysis and Design Considerations , 2011 .

[40]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[41]  D. Berwick,et al.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost. , 2008, Health affairs.

[42]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[43]  P. Lehoux,et al.  The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[44]  N. Powe,et al.  Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. , 2004, JAMA.

[45]  A. Levin,et al.  Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. , 2000, Kidney international.