Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*

This study examines (1) the extent to which student engagement is associated with experimental and traditional measures of academic performance, (2) whether the relationships between engagement and academic performance are conditional, and (3) whether institutions differ in terms of their ability to convert student engagement into academic performance. The sample consisted of 1058 students at 14 four-year colleges and universities that completed several instruments during 2002. Many measures of student engagement were linked positively with such desirable learning outcomes as critical thinking and grades, although most of the relationships were weak in strength. The results suggest that the lowest-ability students benefit more from engagement than classmates, first-year students and seniors convert different forms of engagement into academic achievement, and certain institutions more effectively convert student engagement into higher performance on critical thinking tests.

[1]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[2]  L. Baird.  Biographical and Educational Correlates of Graduate and Professional School Admissions Test Scores , 1976 .

[3]  J. Pohlmann.  A description of effective college teaching in five disciplines as measured by student ratings , 1976 .

[4]  Ann H. Karmos,et al.  A New Case For the Liberal Arts David G. Winter, David C. McClelland, & Abigail J. Stewart San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, 1981 , 1982 .

[5]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  A new case for the liberal arts , 1983 .

[6]  C. Pace.  Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. An Account of the Development and Use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. , 1984 .

[7]  Peter Ewell,et al.  The Self-Regarding Institution: Information for Excellence. NCHEMS Executive Overview. , 1984 .

[8]  A State University Perspective on Student Outcomes Assessment. , 1987 .

[9]  Maryann Jacobi.  College Student Outcomes Assessment: A Talent Development Perspective. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7, 1987. , 1987 .

[10]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Recommendations and Caveats. , 1987 .

[11]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Student Outcomes Assessment: What Institutions Stand to Gain , 1987 .

[12]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[13]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. , 1988 .

[14]  A. Astin,et al.  Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education. , 1991 .

[15]  Gary R. Pike,et al.  Lies, damn lies, and statistics revisited a comparison of three methods of representing change , 1991 .

[16]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[17]  George D. Kuh.  Involving Colleges: Successful Approaches to Fostering Student Learning and Development Outside the Classroom , 1991 .

[18]  Cognitive Effects of Two-Year and Four-Year Colleges: A Preliminary Study. , 1992 .

[19]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[20]  Providing useful information for deans and department chairs , 1994 .

[21]  J. J. Fletcher,et al.  Refocusing the Academic Program Review on Student Learning: The Role of Assessment. , 1994 .

[22]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  Cognitive Effects of Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions: A Preliminary Study , 1994 .

[23]  Peter T. Ewell,et al.  Indicators of "Good Practice" in Undergraduate Education: A Handbook for Development and Implementation. , 1996 .

[24]  P. Terenzini,et al.  Is differential exposure to college linked to the development of critical thinking? , 1996 .

[25]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Learning Productivity at Research Universities , 2001 .

[26]  E. Pascarella.  Identifying Excellence in Undergraduate Education Are We Even Close? , 2001 .

[27]  George D. Kuh.  Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2001 .

[28]  L. Shulman.  Making Differences: A Table of Learning , 2002 .

[29]  George D. Kuh.  What We're Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices , 2003 .

[30]  Susan A. Ariew,et al.  National Survey of Student Engagement , 2003 .

[31]  Gregory C. Wolniak,et al.  Change or Not to Change -- Is There a Question? A Response to Pike , 2004 .

[32]  Gary R. Pike,et al.  Lordis Paradox and the Assessment of Change During College , 2004 .

[33]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  What Does Institutional Selectivity Tell Us About Educational Quality? , 2004 .

[34]  Laura Hamilton,et al.  An Approach to Measuring Cognitive Outcomes Across Higher Education Institutions , 2005 .

[35]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[36]  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research , 2006, The Journal of General Education.

[37]  Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter , 2006 .