Global climate change: The quantifiable sustainability challenge

Population growth and the pressures spawned by increasing demands for energy and resource-intensive goods, foods, and services are driving unsustainable growth in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Recent GHG emission trends are consistent with worst-case scenarios of the previous decade. Dramatic and near-term emission reductions likely will be needed to ameliorate the potential deleterious impacts of climate change. To achieve such reductions, fundamental changes are required in the way that energy is generated and used. New technologies must be developed and deployed at a rapid rate. Advances in carbon capture and storage, renewable, nuclear, and transportation technologies are particularly important; however, global research and development efforts related to these technologies currently appear to fall short relative to needs. Even with a proactive and international mitigation effort, humanity will need to adapt to climate change, but the adaptation needs and damages will be far greater if mitigation activities are not pursued in earnest. In this review, research is highlighted that indicates increasing global and regional temperatures and ties climate changes to increasing GHG emissions. GHG mitigation targets necessary for limiting future global temperature increases are discussed, including how factors such as population growth and the growing energy intensity of the developing world will make these reduction targets more challenging. Potential technological pathways for meeting emission reduction targets are examined, barriers are discussed, and global and U.S. modeling results are presented that suggest that the necessary pathways will require radically transformed electric and mobile sectors. While geoengineering options have been proposed to allow more time for serious emission reductions, these measures are at the conceptual stage with many unanswered cost, environmental, and political issues. Implications: This paper lays out the case that mitigating the potential for catastrophic climate change will be a monumental challenge, requiring the global community to transform its energy system in an aggressive, coordinated, and timely manner. If this challenge is to be met, new technologies will have to be developed and deployed at a rapid rate. Advances in carbon capture and storage, renewable, nuclear, and transportation technologies are particularly important. Even with an aggressive international mitigation effort, humanity will still need to adapt to significant climate change.

[1]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[2]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[3]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[4]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Strengthening forecasts of climate change impacts with multi‐model ensemble averaged projections using MAGICC/SCENGEN 5.3 , 2012 .

[5]  G. Hagler,et al.  Geoengineering: Direct Mitigation of Climate Warming* , 2011 .

[6]  Gcp Global Carbon Project , 2013 .

[7]  PATRICIA VASSELL,et al.  Improving OR Efficiency. , 2016, AORN journal.

[8]  Rachel Warren,et al.  The role of interactions in a world implementing adaptation and mitigation solutions to climate change , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Carlo A. Furia,et al.  User manual , 2023, International Transport Forum Policy Papers.

[10]  Molly O. Baringer,et al.  State of the Climate in 2009 , 2010 .

[11]  Leslie G. Fishbone,et al.  Markal, a linear‐programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the bnl version , 1981 .

[12]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis , 2011 .

[13]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 , 2009 .

[14]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  MAGICC / SCENGEN 5 . 3 : USER MANUAL ( version 2 ) , 2008 .

[15]  R. Quentin Grafton,et al.  global surface temperature , 2012 .

[16]  Frank T. Princiotta,et al.  Global climate change - the technology challenge , 2007 .

[17]  Uwe Remme,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 , 2011 .

[18]  Daniel H Loughlin,et al.  GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Randall A. Childs Economic Impact of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) on the West Virginia Economy , 2009 .

[20]  D. Kampbell,et al.  Office of Research and Development , 1998 .

[21]  R. Betts,et al.  Regional temperature and precipitation changes under high-end (≥4°C) global warming , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  R. Smith,et al.  Department of Defense. , 2020, Military medicine.

[23]  S. Zappe OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION , 1998 .

[24]  Jeff Deyette,et al.  Ripe for Retirem t The Case for Closing America ’ s Costliest Coal Plants , 2012 .

[25]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[26]  R. Betts,et al.  When could global warming reach 4°C? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  The global carbon budget 1959-2011 , 2012 .

[28]  J. Hansen,et al.  GLOBAL SURFACE TEMPERATURE CHANGE , 2010 .

[29]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[30]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .