The Need for Orientation Towards News Media: Revising and Validating a Classic Concept

The need for orientation is the most prominent contingent condition for agenda-setting effects. It provides a psychological explanation for why people engage in information seeking and why some people are susceptible to agenda-setting effects while others are not. The purpose of this paper is to present the development and empirical validation of a three-dimensional scale of need for orientation. Based on a review of previous measures, three dimensions of need for orientation are posited: The need for orientation towards issues, the need for orientation towards facts and the need for orientation towards journalistic evaluations. In a first step, the model is tested on a representative sample applying confirmatory factor analysis. After some modifications, the model is finally validated on another, independent sample. A series of studies demonstrate the psychometric properties of the measure and its construct validity with respect to related constructs. The theoretical utility of the construct and the measure of need for orientation are discussed

[1]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  Agenda-Setting Research: Issues, Attributes, and Influences , 2004 .

[2]  David Lswanson Feeling the Elephant: Some Observations on Agenda-Setting Research , 1988 .

[3]  Wayne Wanta,et al.  The Public and the National Agenda: How People Learn about Important Issues , 1997 .

[4]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing as a theory of media effects , 1999 .

[5]  Patrick Roessler,et al.  The Individual Agenda-Designing Process , 1999 .

[6]  David M. Dozier,et al.  The Media Agenda-Setting Effect of Concrete versus Abstract Issues , 1990 .

[7]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  AGENDA SETTING AND COMMUNITY CONSENSUS: FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[8]  David H. Weaver,et al.  Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance , 1999 .

[9]  Siegfried Gabler,et al.  Idiosyncrasies in Telephone Sampling—The Case of Germany , 2002 .

[10]  M. McCombs,et al.  Voters' Need for Orientation and Use of Mass Communication. , 1973 .

[11]  S. Breckler,et al.  Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern? , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  D. Weaver Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects , 1980 .

[13]  D. Scheufele Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication , 2000 .

[14]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media , 1980 .

[15]  Salma I. Ghanem,et al.  The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing , 2001 .

[16]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[17]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models , 2001 .

[18]  Toshio Takeshita Current Critical Problems in Agenda-Setting Research , 2006 .

[19]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  Mass Media and Political Thought: An Information-Processing Approach , 1987 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[21]  Peter Clarke,et al.  New models for mass communication research , 1973 .

[22]  D. Gerbing,et al.  Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis , 1996 .

[23]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[24]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[25]  S. Noar The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development , 2003 .

[26]  Maxwell McCombs,et al.  The emergence of American political issues : the agenda-setting function of the press , 1977 .

[27]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[28]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  A Comparison of Maximum-Likelihood and Asymptotically Distribution-Free Methods of Treating Incomplete Nonnormal Data , 2003 .

[29]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Country Characteristics as Contingent Conditions of Agenda Setting , 2003, Commun. Res..

[30]  Shimon Gadir,et al.  Agenda Setting , 1980 .

[31]  Oliver P. John,et al.  Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. , 2000 .

[32]  Patrick Rössler,et al.  COGNITIVE BOUNDING AND THE GERMAN UNIFICATION: AGENDA SETTING AND PERSUASION EFFECTS OF MASS MEDIA , 2000 .

[33]  E. López-Escobar,et al.  Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election , 2000 .

[34]  David H. Weaver Media agenda-setting in a Presidential election: Issues, images, and interest , 1981 .

[35]  B. Muthén,et al.  A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model , 1992 .

[36]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[37]  M. Benton,et al.  The Agenda Setting Function of the Mass Media At Three Levels of "Information Holding" , 1976 .

[38]  Issue Obtrusiveness and the Agenda-Setting Effects of National Network News , 1989 .

[39]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  J. Matthes,et al.  Revision und Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung von Vertrauen in Journalismus , 2004 .

[41]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[42]  S. West,et al.  The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. , 1996 .

[43]  James W. Dearing,et al.  Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World , 2002 .

[44]  Hans-Jürgen Weiss,et al.  Structural Equation Models for the Analysis of the Agenda-Setting Process , 1989 .

[45]  Wayne Wanta,et al.  Interpersonal Communication and the Agenda-Setting Process , 1992 .