The Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Properties on Prosthetic Knee Moment and Hip Energetics Required to Achieve Able-Bodied Kinematics

There is a major need in the developing world for a low-cost prosthetic knee that enables users to walk with able-bodied kinematics and low energy expenditure. To efficiently design such a knee, the relationship between the inertial properties of a prosthetic leg and joint kinetics and energetics must be determined. In this paper, using inverse dynamics, the theoretical effects of varying the inertial properties of an above-knee prosthesis on the prosthetic knee moment, hip power, and absolute hip work required for walking with able-bodied kinematics were quantified. The effects of independently varying mass and moment of inertia of the prosthesis, as well as independently varying the masses of each prosthesis segment, were also compared. Decreasing prosthesis mass to 25% of physiological leg mass increased peak late-stance knee moment by 43% and decreased peak swing knee moment by 76%. In addition, it reduced peak stance hip power by 26%, average swing hip power by 76%, and absolute hip work by 22%. Decreasing upper leg mass to 25% of its physiological value reduced absolute hip work by just 2%, whereas decreasing lower leg and foot mass reduced work by up to 22%, with foot mass having the greater effect. Results are reported in the form of parametric illustrations that can be utilized by researchers, designers, and prosthetists. The methods and outcomes presented have the potential to improve prosthetic knee component selection, facilitate able-bodied kinematics, and reduce energy expenditure for users of low-cost, passive knees in developing countries, as well as for users of advanced active knees in developed countries.

[1]  Yashraj S. Narang Identification of design requirements for a high-performance, low-cost, passive prosthetic knee through user analysis and dynamic simulation , 2013 .

[2]  V. N. Murthy Arelekatti,et al.  Design of Mechanism and Preliminary Field Validation of Low-Cost, Passive Prosthetic Knee for Users With Transfemoral Amputation in India , 2015 .

[3]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  Amos G. Winter,et al.  Design of a fully passive prosthetic knee mechanism for transfemoral amputees in India , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[5]  D. Winter,et al.  Analysis of instantaneous energy of normal gait. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  O. Schmitt The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 2017 .

[8]  J. Donelan,et al.  Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  W Raab,et al.  Clinical field testing of trans-femoral prosthetic technologies: Resin-wood and ICRC-polypropylene , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  N. Curtin,et al.  Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. , 1985, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[11]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  C D Mote,et al.  The prediction of metabolic energy expenditure during gait from mechanical energy of the limb: a preliminary study. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  P. E. Martin,et al.  Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral transtibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Ruud Selles,et al.  The effect of prosthetic mass properties on the gait of transtibial amputees—a mathematical model , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[16]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[17]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  A method for optimization of above-knee prosthetic shank-foot inertial characteristics , 1994 .

[18]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Modeling of WalkMECH: A fully-passive energy-efficient transfemoral prosthesis prototype , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[19]  Tim Nolan,et al.  International Diabetes Federation. , 2013, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[20]  Miao-Ju Hsu,et al.  The effects of added prosthetic mass on physiologic responses and stride frequency during multiple speeds of walking in persons with transtibial amputation. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  Philip E. Martin,et al.  Effects of prosthetic mass distribution on metabolic costs and walking symmetry. , 2013, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[23]  Brian J. Hafner,et al.  Clinical Prescription and Use of Prosthetic Foot and Ankle Mechanisms: A Review of the Literature , 2005 .

[24]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  S A Hale,et al.  Analysis of the swing phase dynamics and muscular effort of the above-knee amputee for varying prosthetic shank loads , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  S. Plagenhoef,et al.  Patterns of human motion;: A cinematographic analysis , 1971 .

[27]  Hugh Herr,et al.  User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[28]  Organización Mundial de la Salud Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetic and orthotic services , 1990 .

[29]  Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-tibial amputees , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[30]  C. T. Huang,et al.  Amputation: energy cost of ambulation. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[32]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  D. Grieve,et al.  The relationships between length of stride, step frequency, time of swing and speed of walking for children and adults. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[34]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[35]  Seishi Sawamura,et al.  Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the Walking Ability of Young Transfemoral Amputees: Comparison of IP Users with Able-Bodied People , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[36]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[37]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Mechanical work adaptations of above-knee amputee ambulation. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  D. Gordon E. Robertson,et al.  Research Methods in Biomechanics , 2004 .

[39]  Lexyne L. McNealy,et al.  Effect of prosthetic ankle units on the gait of persons with bilateral trans-femoral amputations , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[40]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[41]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  D. Howard,et al.  Whole body inverse dynamics over a complete gait cycle based only on measured kinematics. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[44]  Sujatha Srinivasan,et al.  Low-dimensional modeling and analysis of human gait with application to the gait of transtibial prosthesis users , 2007 .

[45]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Trunk movements in human locomotion. , 1984, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[46]  L. M. Sheldahl,et al.  Physiological comparison of walking among bilateral above-knee amputee and able-bodied subjects, and a model to account for the differences in metabolic cost. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[47]  S. Simon Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[48]  Samuel R. Hamner,et al.  Designing for Scale: Development of the ReMotion Knee for Global Emerging Markets , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  I. Narang,et al.  Retrospective study of 14,400 civilian disabled (new) treated over 25 years at an Artificial Limb Centre , 1982, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[50]  Doris I. Miller,et al.  The biomechanics of sport : a research approach , 1973 .

[51]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Mass and mass distribution of below-knee prostheses: effect on gait efficacy and self-selected walking speed. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  H. J. de Jongh,et al.  Changes in Hip Muscles After Above‐Knee Amputation , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[53]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[54]  D. Robertson Body Segment Parameters , 2014 .

[55]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  EFFECT OF ALTERATIONS IN PROSTHETIC SHANK MASS ON THE METABOLIC COSTS OF AMBULATION IN ABOVE-KNEE AMPUTEES , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[56]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Effect of prosthetic mass on swing phase work during above-knee amputee ambulation. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[57]  Yashraj S. Narang,et al.  Effects of Prosthesis Mass on Hip Energetics, Prosthetic Knee Torque, and Prosthetic Knee Stiffness and Damping Parameters Required for Transfemoral Amputees to Walk With Normative Kinematics , 2014 .