‘They're not girly girls’: an exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education

Despite sustained efforts to promote engineering careers to young women, it remains the most male-dominated academic discipline in Europe. This paper will provide an overview of UK data and research on women in engineering higher education, within the context of Europe. Comparisons between data from European countries representing various regions of Europe will highlight key differences and similarities between these nations in terms of women in engineering. Also, drawing on qualitative research the paper will explore UK students’ experiences of gender, with a particular focus on the decision to study engineering and their experiences in higher education.

[1]  G. Kirkup,et al.  Women in Engineering: A Good Place To Be? , 1989 .

[2]  F. Sagebiel,et al.  Masculinities in organizational cultures in engineering education in Europe: results of the European Union project WomEng , 2006 .

[3]  J. Glover,et al.  Women Science Graduates in Britain: The Value of Secondary Analysis of Large Scale Data Sets , 1999 .

[4]  Sue Lewis,et al.  Masculinity and the culture of engineering , 1997 .

[5]  Berna Zengin-Arslan,et al.  Women in Engineering Education in Turkey: Understanding the Gendered Distribution , 2002 .

[6]  Mercedes López-Sáez.  Procesos culturales e individuales implicados en la estereotipia de genero. Una aproximación empírica a la elección de carrera Cultural and individual processes involved in gender stereotyping. An empirical study of career selection , 1994 .

[7]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Women in Engineering: A Good Place To Be? , 1989 .

[8]  Albert A. Einsiedel,et al.  Developing Career Commitment in STEM-related Fields: Myths versus Reality , 2007 .

[9]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[10]  Catherine Cronin,et al.  Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education , 1999 .

[11]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[12]  W. Faulkner.  The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to Engineers , 2000 .

[13]  Katariina Alha,et al.  Using ICT to improve the gender balance in engineering education , 2003 .

[14]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  E. Alpay,et al.  Student enthusiasm for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation , 2008 .

[16]  Alison Phipps,et al.  Engineering women: the `gendering' of professional identities , 2002 .

[17]  Melanie Walker,et al.  Engineering Identities , 2001 .

[18]  Brian E. Woolnough,et al.  Factors affecting students' choice of science and engineering , 1994 .

[19]  Yonghong Jade Xu,et al.  Gender Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions , 2008 .

[20]  A. Gale.  Women in Non-traditional Occupations: The Construction Industry , 1994 .

[21]  J. Daudt,et al.  Creating a woman friendly culture in institutes of higher engineering education , 2005 .

[22]  María Lameiras Fernández,et al.  Sexism, Vocational Goals, and Motivation as Predictors of Men’s and Women’s Career Choice , 2006 .

[23]  Anne-Sophie Godfroy-Genin.  Women's academic careers in technology: a comparative European perspective , 2009 .

[24]  Andrew Agapiou,et al.  Perceptions of gender roles and attitudes toward work among male and female operatives in the Scottish construction industry , 2002 .

[25]  Kay Sanderson,et al.  Gendered Jobs and Social Change , 1990 .

[26]  Julia Evetts,et al.  Managing the technology but not the organization: women and career in engineering , 1998 .

[27]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Does the engineering culture in UK higher education advance women’s careers? , 2004 .