The Information Content of Action Potential Trains - A Synaptic Basis

Electrical recordings from three neurons revealed that the same spike train emitted by one neuron had markedly different effects on two target neurons. A spike train from a single neocortical pyramidal neuron produced synaptic responses in two target pyramidal neurons that differed in response strength and rates of activity-dependent depression of synaptic transmission. When a pyramidal neuron targeted another pyramidal neuron as well as an interneuron, then responses were also qualitatively different. The responses onto the pyramidal neuron displayed marked activity-dependent depression while those onto the interneuron displayed marked activity-dependent facilitation. The results suggest that each target could have a unique response to the same presynaptic signal. The information contained within the spike train therefore appears to be fragmented and re-integrated into the network at specific locations. The degree to which the specific fragment extracted by each synapse, will influence the spiking activity of the neuron, depends the ongoing integration of input from other presynaptic neurons. It is therefore proposed that differential synaptic transmission enables the neocortex to encode and decode the information contained within spike trains in an associative manner.

[1]  R. Bertram,et al.  Single-domain/bound calcium hypothesis of transmitter release and facilitation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Synchronization in neuronal transmission and its importance for information processing. , 1994 .

[3]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control , 1997, Science.

[4]  H. Markram,et al.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  L. Maffei,et al.  Neural Correlate of Perceptual Adaptation to Gratings , 1973, Science.

[6]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[7]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Henry Markram,et al.  Plasticity of Neocortical Synapses Enables Transitions between Rate and Temporal Coding , 1996, ICANN.

[9]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  J. Deuchars,et al.  Single axon excitatory postsynaptic potentials in neocortical interneurons exhibit pronounced paired pulse facilitation , 1993, Neuroscience.

[11]  H. Markram,et al.  Differential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  William R. Softky,et al.  Simple codes versus efficient codes , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  W. Betz,et al.  Depression of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Deuchars,et al.  Temporal and spatial properties of local circuits in neocortex , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  C. Stevens,et al.  An evaluation of causes for unreliability of synaptic transmission. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  H. Markram,et al.  Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1996, Nature.