Matching the forecast horizon with the relevant spatial and temporal processes and data sources

Most phenomenological, statistical models used to generate ecological forecasts take either a time-series approach, based on long-term data from one location, or a space-for-time approach, based on data describing spatial patterns across environmental gradients. Here we consider how the forecast horizon determines whether more accurate predictions come from the time-series approach, the space-for-time approach, or a combination of the two. We use two simulated case studies to show that forecasts for short and long forecast horizons need to focus on different ecological processes, which are reflected in different kinds of data. In the short-term, dynamics reflect initial conditions and fast processes such as birth and death, and the time-series approach makes the best predictions. In the long-term, dynamics reflect the additional influence of slower processes such as evolutionary and ecological selection, colonization and extinction, which the space-for-time approach can effectively capture. At intermediate time-scales, a weighted average of the two approaches shows promise. However, making this weighted model operational will require new research to predict the rate at which slow processes begin to influence dynamics.

[1]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. , 2001, Science.

[2]  W. Parton,et al.  Primary Production of the Central Grassland Region of the United States , 1988 .

[3]  P. Adler,et al.  The response of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) to interannual climate variation changes across its range. , 2018, Ecology.

[4]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Predicting The Spread of Ecological Processes , 2003 .

[5]  E. Davis,et al.  Ecological niche models of mammalian glacial refugia show consistent bias , 2014 .

[6]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  An integrated data model to estimate spatiotemporal occupancy, abundance, and colonization dynamics. , 2017, Ecology.

[7]  M. Hooten,et al.  Climate influences the demography of three dominant sagebrush steppe plants. , 2011, Ecology.

[8]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[9]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[10]  Michael C Dietze,et al.  Prediction in ecology: a first-principles framework. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Ben Collen,et al.  Complexity is costly: a meta‐analysis of parametric and non‐parametric methods for short‐term population forecasting , 2014 .

[12]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  An ensemble quadratic echo state network for non‐linear spatio‐temporal forecasting , 2017, 1708.05094.

[13]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Precipitation and winter temperature predict long‐term range‐scale abundance changes in Western North American birds , 2014, Global change biology.

[15]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Lags in the response of mountain plant communities to climate change , 2018, Global change biology.

[16]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  The Dynamics of Molecular Evolution Over 60,000 Generations , 2017, Nature.

[17]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  B. Otto‐Bliesner,et al.  No‐analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st‐century predictions by species distribution models , 2012 .

[19]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[20]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Forecasting biodiversity in breeding birds using best practices , 2017, bioRxiv.

[21]  J. Silvertown,et al.  The Park Grass Experiment 1856–2006: its contribution to ecology , 2006 .

[22]  O. Sala,et al.  Long-Term Forage Production of North American Shortgrass Steppe. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  Jonas Knape,et al.  The cost of complexity in forecasts of population abundances is reduced but not eliminated by borrowing information across space using a hierarchical approach , 2020 .

[24]  B. Poulter,et al.  Multi‐model comparison highlights consistency in predicted effect of warming on a semi‐arid shrub , 2018, Global change biology.

[25]  M. Payne,et al.  The predictive skill of species distribution models for plankton in a changing climate , 2016, Global change biology.

[26]  S. Jackson,et al.  Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises , 2007 .

[27]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  When mechanism matters: Bayesian forecasting using models of ecological diffusion. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[28]  Erin M. Schliep,et al.  Joint species distribution modelling for spatio‐temporal occurrence and ordinal abundance data , 2018 .

[29]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Extreme heterogeneity of population response to climatic variation and the limits of prediction , 2019, Global change biology.

[30]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Climate change and evolutionary adaptation , 2011, Nature.

[31]  G. Williamson,et al.  Environmental niche modelling fails to predict Last Glacial Maximum refugia: niche shifts, microrefugia or incorrect palaeoclimate estimates? , 2014 .

[32]  Kimberly S. Sheldon,et al.  On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  David B. Dunson,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of predictive performance of 33 species distribution models at species and community levels , 2019, Ecological Monographs.

[34]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  The priority of prediction in ecological understanding , 2017 .

[35]  R. Julliard,et al.  REVIEW: Predictive ecology in a changing world , 2015 .