Five robust trait dimensions: development, stability, and utility.

Interest has grown in recent years in a five-factor model for the organization of personality characteristics. A brief history of the development of this model is given. It is evident that the model is very general, across variations in raters and ratees and across languages. There is also evidence that the structure of personality inventories reflects this model. Although most of the studies that have demonstrated the model have utilized either self-report inventories or have relied on ratings, there is clear evidence that both ratings and inventories are importantly related to actual behavior. A longitudinal study of children's personality traits is reported. Evidence for the five-factor model is examined, including data for the stability over time of characteristics organized in terms of the model. One trait of particular focus in this study has been Factor 3, often interpreted as Conscientiousness but here referred to as Will to Achieve because of its high correlations with formal measures of educational achievement. Studies indicate that this dimension is responsible for much of the variance in achievement left unexplained by aptitude measures.

[1]  Fritz Ostendorf,et al.  The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research , 1988 .

[2]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. , 1986 .

[5]  M. Lorr,et al.  Factors common to the ISI and the 16PF inventories. , 1985, Journal of clinical psychology.

[6]  J. Gormly Correspondence between personality trait ratings and behavioral events , 1984 .

[7]  R. Savin-Williams,et al.  In search of personality traits: A multimethod analysis of naturally occurring prosocial and dominance behavior. , 1983 .

[8]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  M. Lorr,et al.  Higher-Order Personality Factors Of The ISI. , 1978, Multivariate Behavioral Research.

[10]  E. Howarth WERE CATTELL'S ‘PERSONALITY SPHERE’ FACTORS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE? , 1976 .

[11]  J. Guilford Factors and factors of personality. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  Prediction of First-Year Graduate Success in Psychology: Peer Ratings , 1969 .

[13]  Gene M. Smith Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research , 1967 .

[14]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. , 1966 .

[15]  J. M. Digman Child Behavior Ratings: Further Evidence of a Multiple-Factor Model of Child Personality , 1965 .

[16]  J. M. Digman Principal dimensions of child personality as inferred from teachers' judgments. , 1963, Child development.

[17]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[18]  R. Cattell,et al.  Child personality structure as revealed in teachers' behavior ratings. , 1957, Journal of clinical psychology.

[19]  D. W. Fiske Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors , 1947, Psychometrika.