Population models for Greater Snow Geese: a comparison of different approaches to assess potential impacts of harvest

Demographic models, which are a natural extension of capture–recapture (CR) methodology, are a powerful tool to guide decisions when managing wildlife populations. We compare three different modelling approaches to evaluate the effect of increased harvest on the population growth of Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica). Our first approach is a traditional matrix model where survival was reduced to simulate increased harvest. We included environmental stochasticity in the matrix projection model by simulating good, average, and bad years to account for the large inter–annual variation in fecundity and first–year survival, a common feature of birds nesting in the Arctic. Our second approach is based on the elasticity (or relative sensitivity) of population growth rate (lambda) to changes in survival as simple functions of generation time. Generation time was obtained from the mean transition matrix based on the observed proportion of good, average and bad years between 1985 and 1998. If we assume that hunting mortality is additive to natural mortality, then a simple formula predicts changes in lambda as a function of changes in harvest rate. This second approach can be viewed as a simplification of the matrix model because it uses formal sensitivity results derived from population projection. Our third, and potentially more powerful approach, uses the Kalman Filter to combine information on demographic parameters, i.e. the population mechanisms summarized in a transition matrix model, and the census information (i.e. annual survey) within an overall Gaussian likelihood. The advantage of this approach is that it minimizes process and measured uncertainties associated with both the census and demographic parameters based on the variance of each estimate. This third approach, in contrast to the second, can be viewed as an extension of the matrix model, by combining its results with the independent census information.

[1]  ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF THE GREATER SNOW GOOSE POPULATION , 2004 .

[2]  E. Cooch,et al.  Apparent differences in stochastic growth rates based on timing of census: a cautionary note , 2003 .

[3]  J. D. Lebreton,et al.  Multistate recapture models: Modelling incomplete individual histories , 2002 .

[4]  Jean Clobert,et al.  ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists , 1995 .

[5]  G. Gauthier,et al.  AGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AFFECT RECRUITMENT IN GREATER SNOW GEESE , 2003 .

[6]  Gary C. White,et al.  Seasonal Compensation of Predation and Harvesting , 1999 .

[7]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[8]  H. Caswell.  PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE PERTURBATION ANALYSES: THEIR ROLES IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2000 .

[9]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Reproductive consequences of egg‐laying decisions in snow geese , 2000 .

[10]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Changes in survival rates and population dynamics of greater snow geese over a 30‐year period: implications for hunting regulations , 2002 .

[11]  Christopher Fonnesbeck,et al.  Application of integrated Bayesian modeling and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to the conservation of a harvested species , 2004 .

[12]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Population ecology of the mallard: VI. The effect of exploitation on survival , 1976 .

[14]  E. Rexstad.  Effect of hunting on annual survival of Canada geese in Utah , 1992 .

[15]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Compensatory mortality in waterfowl populations: A review of the evidence and implications for research and management , 1984 .

[16]  Roger Pradel,et al.  SEASONAL SURVIVAL OF GREATER SNOW GEESE AND EFFECT OF HUNTING UNDER DEPENDENCE IN SIGHTING PROBABILITY , 2001 .

[17]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[18]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter , 1990 .

[19]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  The efficient integration of abundance and demographic data , 2003 .

[20]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[21]  G. Gauthier,et al.  The Exploitation of Wetland Ecosystems by Herbivores on Bylot Island , 1996 .

[22]  R. Rockwell,et al.  Long-Term Changes in Survival Rates of Lesser Snow Geese , 1992 .

[23]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population Dynamics in Variable Environments , 1990 .

[24]  Jean-Dominique Lebreton,et al.  DYNAMICAL AND STATISTICAL MODELS FOR EXPLOITED POPULATIONS † , 2005 .

[25]  P Besbeas,et al.  Integrating Mark–Recapture–Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters , 2002, Biometrics.

[26]  J. Nichols,et al.  Estimation by capture-recapture of recruitment and dispersal over several sites , 2003 .

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Tests of Compensatory vs. Additive Hypotheses of Mortality in Mallards , 1984 .