Incomplete information and the time series behaviour of consumption

Pischke (1995) uses both microeconomic and macroeconomic US data to test the idea that, within an otherwise standard PIH framework, ignorance by agents of aggregate labour income can account for the observed degree of excess smoothness and sensitivity in consumption. His tests involve only the second moments of aggregate consumption and labour income. In this paper our main aim is to identify and test the restrictions his model implies for aggregate consumption dynamics, using US quarterly data over the period 1959-1996, but our framework allows us also to test an earlier, related model of Goodfriend (1992). We find that both models can be formally rejected: ignorance of aggregate labour income cannot by itself account for aggregate consumption dynamics; some other relaxation of the assumptions of the standard PIH is required. We give an example of one possible such relaxation and present evidence indicating that Pischke's version of imperfect information may, within that framework, have a significant role to play. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Joseph G. Altonji,et al.  Testing the Response of Consumption to Income Changes with (Noisy) Paneldata , 1986 .

[2]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  The econometric analysis of time series , 1991 .

[3]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  The Limits to Rational Expectations , 1988 .

[4]  J. Muellbauer.  Habits, Rationality and Myopia in the Life Cycle Consumption Function , 1988 .

[5]  Lawrence J. Christiano,et al.  The Permanent Income Hypothesis Revisited , 1987 .

[6]  A. Blinder,et al.  The Time Series Consumption Function Revisited , 1985 .

[7]  S. Zeldes.  Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  John Y. Campbell,et al.  Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence , 1989, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[9]  James D. Hamilton.  Time Series Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  A. Deaton.  Saving and Liquidity Constraints , 1989 .

[11]  N. Duck,et al.  Partial adjustment and the permanent income hypothesis , 1992 .

[12]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  J. Cochrane,et al.  The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near-Rational Alternatives , 1988 .

[14]  Marvin Goodfriend,et al.  Information-Aggregation Bias , 1991 .

[15]  Marjorie Flavin,et al.  The Adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations About Future Income , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  N. Mankiw,et al.  Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption , 1987 .

[17]  John Y. Campbell,et al.  Does Saving Anticipate Declining Labor Income? an Alternative Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis , 1987 .

[18]  Jorn-Steffen Pischke,et al.  Individual Income, Incomplete Information and Aggregate Consumption , 1995 .

[19]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  A Generalised R2 Criterion for Regression Models Estimated by the Instrumental Variable Method , 1994 .

[20]  Angus Deaton,et al.  Life-Cycle Models of Consumption: is the Evidence Consistent with the Theory? , 1986 .

[21]  John Y. Campbell,et al.  Why is Consumption So Smooth , 1989 .

[22]  C. Sims,et al.  NEARLY EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF TIME SERIES MODELS WITH PREDETERMINED, BUT NOT EXOGENOUS, INSTRUMENTS , 1983 .

[23]  F. Hayashi.  The Permanent Income Hypothesis and Consumption Durability: Analysis Based on Japanese Panel Data , 1984 .