An empirical investigation of the influence of social desirability on the factor structure of the Chinese 16PF

Abstract This study examined whether social desirability affects the factor structure of the Chinese 16PF. Participants were 4645 Chinese first-year undergraduate and graduate students who completed the Chinese 16PF as part of a mandatory psychological assessment. Based on students’ score on the Impression Management scale (Paulhus, 1998), two groups were formed: (a) the high socially desirable responding group, consisting of students whose IM scores fell within the upper 20% of the distribution, and (b) the low socially desirable responding group, consisting of students whose IM scores fell within the bottom 25% of the distribution. A series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the factor pattern and factor loadings of the Chinese 16PF were invariant across these two groups.

[1]  J. L. Warner,et al.  Inflation bias in self-assessment examinations: Implications for valid employee selection. , 1984 .

[2]  Gerald V. Barrett,et al.  Validity of Personnel Decisions: A Conceptual Analysis of the Inferential and Evidential Bases , 1989 .

[3]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  The Big Five in Personnel Selection: Factor Structure in Applicant and Nonapplicant Populations , 1993 .

[5]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF NON-COGNITIVE MEASURES DECAYS WHEN APPLICANTS FAKE. , 1996 .

[6]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .

[7]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique , 2003 .

[8]  M. Dickson,et al.  Personnel selection and the five-factor model : Reexamining the effects of applicant's frame of reference , 2001 .

[9]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  GROUP DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY: META‐ANALYSES COMPARING FIVE U.S. RACIAL GROUPS , 2008 .

[11]  Richard L. Griffith,et al.  Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior , 2007 .

[12]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  D. Paulhus.  Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[14]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  J. Ellingson,et al.  Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[17]  Neil M. A. Hauenstein,et al.  The moderating effects of sample type as evidence of the effects of faking on personality scale correlations and factor structure , 2006 .

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[19]  F. Drasgow,et al.  Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement , 1999 .

[21]  N W Zane,et al.  Community mental health services for ethnic minority groups: a test of the cultural responsiveness hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: insights into response distortion. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[24]  Rose A. Mueller-Hanson,et al.  Faking and selection: considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[26]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[27]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[28]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Social desirability corrections in personality measurement : Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity , 1999 .

[29]  S. Shavitt,et al.  What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. , 1996 .

[31]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .